this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
149 points (99.3% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
597 readers
275 users here now
Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!
Rules:
- Posts must abide by Piefed.social terms and conditions
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
Related communities:
!forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
More nukes are surely going to solve that problem.
Why not? Just fill the canal with oil instead of water and make it the new pipeline. This will also save money by not requiring ships to transport the oil. Or you can drive a ship filled with oil on the canal filled with oil, giving you twice the oil in one go. (certainly no insane troll logic here)
Real life ideas involving nukes to make canals through the desert aren't that much less insane, and also give a rough estimate of the amount and size of nukes required.
Excuse me while I bang my head against a wall enough times that it approximates the level of brain damage as a lead-lined boomer brain.