this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
246 points (94.9% liked)

Games

24323 readers
451 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jyk0L8eLs7jd7es.png

I'm completely speechless. This looks so terrible I thought it was a joke, but apparently Nvidia released these demos to impress people. DLSS 5 runs the entire game through an AI filter, making every character look like it's running through an ultra realistic beauty filter.

The photo above is used as the promo image for the official blog post by the way. It completely ignores artistic intent and makes Grace's face look "sexier" because apparently that's what realism looks like now.

I wouldn't be so baffled if this was some experimental setting they were testing, but they're advertising this as the next gen DLSS. As in, this is their image of what the future of gaming should be. A massive F U to every artist in the industry. Well done, Nvidia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 22 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (6 children)

Would you say the same thing if you didn't know that it was AI? I think it actually looks pretty good overall, although some of the changes (like deciding that this character dyes her hair had has undyed roots) are odd.

Edit: It seems to do a better job with the soccer player.

Edit 2: I wonder if it works better with male faces than with female ones. It's making the woman's eyes and lips bigger but not the man's.

[–] shani66@ani.social 1 points 1 minute ago

Yes, it looks bad regardless of the bad tech behind it.

Unrelated to the AI

What’s up with his chin? The chins off center and then the beard is even more.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 26 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Agreed.

The effect is waaaaay too strong in those screenshots, but a more subtle version would be alright.

And yes. It's definitely "sexifying" the woman in the shot. Transformers img2img models are notorious for basically:

I could speculate why. Could be that it's (unfortunately) mostly male Tech Bros developing them? Or it could be that a massive fraction of the dataset is sexualized photos of women scraped from social media. But TBH, while I don't know why this is the case, pretty much all diffusion models tend to "Instagram" women more than men.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago

Or it could be that a massive fraction of the dataset is sexualized photos of women scraped from social media

Bias in Bias out

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I kind of agree with you.

It does not look bad. What im worried is that the ai cant keep up and will end up changing the look of the characters and i hate that it will take the agency from the artists.

[–] Epp@lemmus.org 2 points 12 hours ago

What of the agency of the players? Who will be sitting in the room and impacted, if this optional feature is enabled in the privacy of one's home? Will the artist, halfway around the world suddenly wail and fall over in pain because of personal preference?

I guess it's the same as when people put steak sauce on a steak, and all the chefs who love the taste of bloody meat cry that the meal has been ruined... Except they're not the ones eating it. They can enjoy their own creations however they like without getting all nitpicky about how others have their own preferences.

[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Realistically the artists working on it have a say into what graphics settings are allowed, and they already deal with the fact some people will need to run on very low settings, also affecting their ideal viewing conditions. If the newer DLSS really makes such sweeping changes they would either ask Nvidia for improvements, disable it, or heavily dissuade it.

But player autonomy is also important, so it's a balancing act. If the players end up wanting it and you take it away from them, it still won't make sense to strip it out at the end of the day.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 1 points 19 hours ago

Do you have a problem with all the reshade presets for Skyrim you can find on Nexus Mods?

[–] maltasoron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 13 hours ago

I feel like the soccer player does look more like his real life counterpart (Virgil van Dijk) with DLSS off.

[–] calliope@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

The popular “it looks awful” kneejerk is so telling.

I dislike AI, but the utter delusion around it reminds me of how people complained about the internet in the 90s. There was a sensible fear, and then there were essentially Luddites.

Everything repeats.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

But the younger women in those screenshots are absolutely "sexified."

I'm an AI evangalist as far as Lemmy goes, but that is a problem. It's beyond a "sensible fear" problem, its unignorable and unacceptable. I'm kind of shocked DF didn't point it out.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

"All technological development is good because there are always people who complain and then the technological development continues regardless. There's no point in critique, everything is always perfect and nothing you say will change it anyway so who cares."

[–] calliope@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

“I only see things in black and white because I haven’t grown up”

I actually blocked you on another account because you’re such a douchebag. I wish those could be exported more easily!