this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
200 points (99.5% liked)

World News

54790 readers
3781 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NYT reports that one of the US aircraft carriers has to withdraw to port due to a laundry room fire. About 600 sailors lost access to their bunks.

The fire, according to two officials, began in the vent of a dryer in the ship’s laundry facilities and quickly spread. Sailors battled the blaze for more than 30 hours, officials and sailors said.

The Navy did not respond to a request for comment. Central Command said in its statement that the fire caused “no damage to the ship’s propulsion plant, and the aircraft carrier remains fully operational.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 8 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

improperly maintained systems

On a US Navy warship? The US military which has procedures and protocols for everything just... compromised mission-readiness by overlooking a simple, well-known, but critical maintenance item? I mean, this could possibly be something that the yard staff was tasked with when the ship comes in after a standard six-month deployment, but if they're overlooking stuff like that, it makes one wonder about the overall preparedness of the Navy.

Sabotage. I guarantee you, this regime will fall to either a military coup, or its own service members sabotaging their equipment in protest before they defect or desert.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

It works like this, before they go to fight, they're the most invincible, most prepared, most tactical, most notorious, with the most fire power ready to turn countries to glass.

When they get fucked, its a local scout's fault, not that serious, happens all the time, nothing suspicious, rookie mistake, maintenance problems, not a big deal, just jets sliding off of ships, smoking mistake, and so on.

You get the idea. You can almost predict what their "explanation" are going to be. It'll be anything but accepting that they got their ass handed to them.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's a meme that the weakness of the Death Star is a tiny overlooked vent for a reason. The big things are carefully considered. The tiny things, like a dryer vent, are often overlooked.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 12 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I found online a Navy manual from the '70s which prescribed laundry operations in excruciating detail, running over a hundred pages. It required cleaning the dryer lint traps every 2 hours, and monthly cleaning of the ducts. The Navy even has ratings specifically for laundry workers, Ship's Serviceman (Laundry).

It just blows mind that this isn't a solved problem, since it was solved 50 years ago!

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago

That doesn't mean the procedure was actually followed though.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Right, that's all good. Now you have to get a couple of low-ranking servicemen to carry out every step of that hundred page manual to the letter on each of their several dozen machines, daily, after they've been deployed for an ongoing 10 months because their superiors are morons, and are further scheduled to become the longest running carrier deployment of all time at over a year of deploy time, because their superiors are morons.

I'd believe that some corners were cut in these servicemen's duty, and it just happened to be one too many corners one too many times. The men are fatigued, they want to get off the ship. It's possible these corners were even cut on purpose with exactly this result in mind in an attempt to get them off the ship.

[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

If by “cutting corners” you mean “actively packing dryer lint into a place where it could conceivably be a mistake” I’d agree.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 9 points 16 hours ago

That's the thing about militaries. Like any other organization, it's all still humans.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago

You can bet they won't now.