this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
257 points (98.5% liked)

Atheism

5993 readers
395 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Kinda fucked up to draw that conclusion from him telling a rich guy to give it all to the poor. Not to him, directly to the poor.

The problem isn't Christ's doctrine, it's the endless lineage of grifters twisting it to take the money for themselves.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, I side with the fig tree. Show me a christian church without massive sin.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

On that we can agree. It is my understanding that the only true "church" is just the collective population of believers, and that establishments/organizations of religion are anathema to Christ's teachings.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

How is a collective different from an organization?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Except I'm not drawing it exclusively from one verse.

I'm drawing that conclusion from an understanding of both his nature, and literally that of every other charlatan.

He was faking miracles in order to grift people out of their hard-earned money. Further more, it's quite clear by the same accounts in the gospels that Jesus did not in fact have any beef with rich people, per se, and often enjoyed the benefits wealth brought. (i.e. by staying in their homes.)

There's no reason to imagine Jesus was any better than any other faith-healing grifter.

And lets be perfectly clear here, those gospels also say he said he'd return and do the whole messiah thing, the final judgement, all that, before all of the disciples would have died. that clearly has not happened.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Those gospels were all written well after his death. They're probably about as accurate as George Washington chopping down the cherry tree.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Mythicism doesn’t paint any better of a picture of whoever came up with the “teachings”.

Either way, whoever started it was scamming people. (I would suggest Paul was from the get go, too, even if Jesus was real.)

That said, if Jesus was real and he claimed to be a messiah, then he would have been expected to do miracles to prove it. So if the most basic part of his claim is true, he’d have had to do a little sumth’n sumth’n

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Ah, I can see how you'd interpret the situation that way, if you suppose fake miracles were involved. I'm not convinced there were any miracles, real or fake, rather than such things being added to the account later by charlatans to lend legitimacy to their claims.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Anyone claiming to be the messiah would have had to do miracles. It was basically how a messiah would validate his claims and not get, you know, stoned and left in a ditch somewhere. (and getting people to follow him as he massed an army to make a go at the whole World Domination thing.) the only reason we really know about him at all is because he annoyed the romans enough they got involved. (and that was less about jesus and more that the romans didn't like locals doing their own executions. leaving bodies in ditches is very untidy, and in any case, executions were subject to roman approval, even if Herod could have ordered it.)

In point of fact, the roman occupation and oppression made such messages very very attractive to people. Which, uh. made them very easy to scam. which made grifters pretending to be the messiah and scamming them rather common. Simon bar Giora, John of Giscala, Menehem ben Judas all come to mind.

Just like people claiming Trump is the antichrist is compelling to certain segments today.

None of what Jesus is recorded as teaching is even all that new. People have been saying that people should be basically decent. But what that meant to Jesus was something rather different than what it means to us. We read far too much of our modern understanding of things into the gospels. Jesus literally had more to say about paying taxes to oppressors than he did about slavery- and yet, slavery was such a common institution that he would have seen it daily.

He would have seen slaves on a near-daily, especially after going into Jerusalem; yet never once dd he say anything about it. never once did he go to a slave market and start flipping tables.

Suffice it to say, that if there was a historical Jesus, he was an ironage charlatan who was saying what people wanted to hear, in order get money from them. And you'll notice, they kept moving around? yeah. That's so the people that gave money and didn't get healed couldn't find them.

if there wasn't a historical Jesus... then whoever came up with all that shit is just as bad, and just as much charlatans. (and they too were faking miracles, supposedly.)