this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
212 points (99.1% liked)

Programming

26309 readers
1207 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 72 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For every HTML 2.0 you might have tried, you were just as likely to have got stuck in the dead-end of Flash.

This one hurt. I had a decade plus old piece of tech debt from when they fucking killed flash before I could move on to new projects.

[–] Redkey@programming.dev 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I sympathize with the point of the article, but if someone's seriously citing Flash, which had widespread success for a run of about 15 years before being overtaken by later developments (driven in part by a billionaire with an axe to grind), as a short-lived "dead end" that was best avoided, then how long do they think is a sensible amount of time to wait to see if something's worth spending time and effort? Nothing remains on top forever.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

Well, I'm still waiting for that new language everyone is talking about to mature enough for being really useful, it's not even 50 years old yet, that C++ lang

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Flash had its use. I think a better analogy for me is web frameworks.

I remember in the mid 2000s there seems to be a new one every week. “LOL, you aren’t using Ruby On Rails? Peasant!” “LOL, you aren’t using Django? Peasant!”

Still seems to be the case with Electron, React, Node, blah blah blah.

Running to stand still.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

“LOL, you aren’t using Django? Peasant!”

... I'm working on learning Django to get a job... should I stop? What should I use instead?

My webserver I've had for a while supports basically that.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago

Django isn't going anywhere. The point is not to jump on the latest fad, which Django isn't.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m the wrong person to ask. My goto language is older than I am and hasn’t had a meaningful change since I was born.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

cobol? fortran? c? assembly? so many options

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

C.

I exaggerate a bit. C99 lets you declare variables anywhere inside the block, not just the top.

Which still got me into an argument with a coworker who wanted me to declare every variable at the top of the block “in case” we port the code to a compiler that doesn’t support it.

C99 was 20 years old at that point.

Newer versions of C have generics “support” but I haven’t seen it in the wild yet.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder what the last programming language will be...

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fortran has a 2018 release. Assembly is tied to the cpu, so I assume it changes every iteration.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just consider it's origin to be ancient...

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's irrelevant is it's updated frequently.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Not completely, there are some designs choices that are to stay in old languages but would not exist in younger ones

[–] logi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

... I'm working on learning Django to get a job... should I stop? What should I use instead?

As the other comment said, Django isn't going anywhere. I'd not start a new project in it, but it'll be with us for a long time.

For a more modern (and better) python stack, but which is also definitely here to stay, I'd look at FastAPI with sqlalchemy.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Well, I'm working on django-ninja , and that is vaugely related to fastapi, so I've got that going for me I guess. Thanks for the heads up

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I feel like the web framework question has stabilized in recent years. React and node (not a web framework but in a similar boat) are stable and common, and angular and a few others are good alternatives.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I hear they’re changing the language these things run on from JavaScript to TypeScript.

No thanks to the hamster wheel.

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, Typescript just compiles down to JavaScript. I'm also generally anti a million frameworks, but JavaScript to TypeScript is easy

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Isn't it also like opt in? If you don't annotate a type it just defaults to Any, which is just unchecked like standard JS

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

As far as I know, it is. Type safety is optional but very useful sometimes

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

TS is a superset of js though, you can still use normal js and probably won't have to even change the file extension or anything like literally 0 change