this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
243 points (98.8% liked)
Progressive Politics
4411 readers
476 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ethics aside (yes, I know that's a huge asterisk):
We've set up society to be dependent on dual-income households. Given that the most commonly cited reason people aren't reproducing (starting later, stopping sooner, w/e) is economics, limiting women's ability to contribute financially to a household is only going to exacerbate this.
As a childfree man, I don't want a woman to be dependent on me. If my partner is stuck at home due to being unable to work, that isn't going to make me suddenly decide that I want to become a parent. If I was on the fence (which I'm not), it would definitely push me onto the "no" side of the fence due to financial considerations.
This is just fucking stupid and won't work the way they think it will.
On your second point: I'm pretty sure there will be a push to ban all contraceptives so the only option you have to not have children is to not have sex. Of course some people will abstain or do non-vaginal sex but it will be a numbers game.
Will be? They've been attacking them from every angle they can think of for years.