this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
29 points (96.8% liked)

askchapo

23246 readers
310 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi friends. Is it fucked up to flirt with someone with no intention of taking it further? I'm in a long-term monogamous relationship. Sometimes I crave a little validation from strangers. I'm not going to cheat on my partner, but I do have a need to feel desirable to others. I don't feel like a bit of flirting is a betrayal of my relationship, but I'm less confident about how other people feel. Like, I don't want to waste someone else's time, but I guess maybe I am leading people on a bit if I chat with them without mentioning my partner.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

flirting implies the further complications are possible to begin with. the whole social purpose of flirting is a plausibly deniable offer to escalate towards them.

it is incredibly cruel to dangle something in front of someone when you have no intention of following through.

it's one thing if you flirt for a while and don't feel it, but it's evil if you go into it misrepresenting your intentions.

[–] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

At what point is flirting so obvious that it's dangling in front of you but is also at the same time "plausibly deniable?"

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

a successful run goes something like

opening move -> reciprocity -> escalation -> escalation -> escalation -> etc -> romantic and/or sexual entanglement

so i'd say 3 is where you have the opportunity to say thanks and move on having had an exchange of compliments rather than necessarily flirting, and if you stick around for the second round of escalation then you're indicating you're potentially down for something and somebody like OP would be there in bad faith.

and again this is about the case where OP is deliberately being a vampire, if you're flirting with somebody for a while and decide not to continue for whatever reason that's fine, but you shouldn't start the process if you're completely closed off to begin with.

[–] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

A SUCCESSFUL RUN i am going to puke, hooking up is not a video game. What is this PUA shit??? WTF?

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 3 points 4 hours ago

like run-through? older term than video games lol

[–] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 5 points 12 hours ago

I suppose the framing of flirtation in the OP is necessarily different than something you may not even realize was happening until 2 weeks later because of the intention.

I don't really understand the flowchart but i see what you're saying. There's a point where both parties are aware that explicit flirting is happening and if that wasnt where OP wanted to take it there wouldn't be a question.

The amount of times I've had someone tell me I've been flirted with or thought about an interaction weeks later where "...wait were they flirting or just being nice?" Made me think OP was gonna go around complimenting people and seeing if they got a nice response...