537
Bernie Sanders and AOC introduce bill to pause building of new datacenters
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
537 points (99.1% liked)
politics
29085 readers
2740 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Nice, but obviously going nowhere.
Being correct too early is what being a leftist means, after all.
If the only battles we fight are ones we're guaranteed to win, we'll never win the war.
Bring this shit up, even if it'll never get to a vote.
It shows America that some will fight, but that they need the numbers.
That only makes sense if by "too early" you mean "before the majority".
And if no one pushed for progress until the majority of Congress wants it, we'd never get it.
80+ years ago Congress told FDR he had to wait "one more term" before they'd support universal healthcare which the majority of voters wanted and elected FDR to enact.
Stop fucking catering to the majority of congress, and start catering to voters.
That's how we win elections and make progress.
Changing politicians to match voters. Changing voters to match politicians doesn't work
Quick edit:
Sometimes changing voters to match a politician "works" as in winning election...
But we just saw how that works out. The politician doesn't do enough, that party's voters disengage, and the opposing party captures the entire federal government.
It's a bandaid that can work every once and a while, but even when it does there's no pay off. So turnout plummets in the next couple elections.
This shit ain't complicated, it's basic sociology
Was Biden right when he opposed universal healthcare, or is it just a new set of rich donors?
Biden isn't even vaguely left leaning. Am I missing the joke?
We agree there. Given he won the nomination I guess there are very few left leaning Americans.
You are correct. I'm considered a "radical leftist" because I have crazy ideas like "don't put kids in cages" and "the mentally ill shouldn't be left to die on the street".
Clearly polarizing positions that directly contradict the teachings of Jesus.
If you followed how he got nominated, it was yet another scheme by the establishment Dems (who are a center right party, in the rest of the world's perspective) to stop Sanders or any properly leftist candidate from winning.
All the less popular candidates dropped out and endorsed Biden on the same day at a critical moment in the primary season.
It was less obvious than the heavy-handed tactics of 2024's primaries, but he was absolutely ordained by the party and not the primary voters.
Well how are people surprised that Trump won then, if the democrats are rigging the system?