this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
536 points (99.1% liked)

politics

29085 readers
3326 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/44996161

March 25, 2026

The policy, announced by Bernie Sanders, an independent senator from Vermont, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democratic representative, on Wednesday morning, aims to ensure the AI boom protects the environment and communities, and benefits workers instead of harming them. A temporary ban, the lawmakers say, would give the US government time to create strong federal safeguards for AI, which is “affecting everything from our economy and wellbeing to our democracy, warfare and our kids’ education”.

“AI and robotics are creating the most sweeping technological revolution in the history of humanity,” Sanders said in an emailed statement. “The scale, scope, and speed of that change is unprecedented. Congress is way behind where it should be in understanding the nature of this revolution and its impacts.”

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bernie just did a YouTube video talking with Claude about this and it's good

https://youtu.be/h3AtWdeu_G0

It did change my opinion on the subject primarily from the pov that a bit of wait is good in corrupt systems as it allows justice to catch up and datacenters are not critical infrastructure - we can shop around.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think the biggest thing, unsure if mentioned in the video, as far as shopping around goes, is electricity consumption.

Our data centers are inefficient as fuck. Give it a few years and building them out might not destroy the planet.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Good point and a market squeeze can move them to more electricity efficient remote areas like the deserts. Fuck off there lol

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nice, but obviously going nowhere.

Being correct too early is what being a leftist means, after all.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

but obviously going nowhere.

If the only battles we fight are ones we're guaranteed to win, we'll never win the war.

Bring this shit up, even if it'll never get to a vote.

It shows America that some will fight, but that they need the numbers.

Being correct too early

That only makes sense if by "too early" you mean "before the majority".

And if no one pushed for progress until the majority of Congress wants it, we'd never get it.

80+ years ago Congress told FDR he had to wait "one more term" before they'd support universal healthcare which the majority of voters wanted and elected FDR to enact.

Stop fucking catering to the majority of congress, and start catering to voters.

That's how we win elections and make progress.

Changing politicians to match voters. Changing voters to match politicians doesn't work

Quick edit:

Sometimes changing voters to match a politician "works" as in winning election...

But we just saw how that works out. The politician doesn't do enough, that party's voters disengage, and the opposing party captures the entire federal government.

It's a bandaid that can work every once and a while, but even when it does there's no pay off. So turnout plummets in the next couple elections.

This shit ain't complicated, it's basic sociology

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can we modify the bill to include forcibly closing and outlawing existing datacenters?

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I think people would probably be upset at losing access to their banking, Gmail, Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, etc. accounts. Basically every big company website runs through data centres.

Don’t get me wrong, I have deep nostalgia for the “small web” days of the 90s. But if we want to go back to that we’d have to do a little more planning than just “shut down all the data centres!”

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would love if someone brought the infrasound argument to the table.

https://youtu.be/_bP80DEAbuo

If the argument were that it poses a health and safety risk to people, it might eventually be possible to regulate them similarly to oil fields.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With this admin, I feel like that would be a benefit to their whims. The rich are in charge and they think we should be enslaved or dead. You'd be better off showing how many billionaire heads you could stack before they fell over!

[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Every person that loses their job to AI is just another person with lots of free time on their hands and no means to support themselves and their family.

I truly do not know what their long term plan is, assuming they even have one (bold assumption, I know) but it seems to me that having huge masses of unemployed people with tons of motivation and nothing better to do is like, the last thing I would be pushing for if I was of the ownership class.

Especially with data centers...which need to be connected to the outside world with sufficient speed to be anything more than miles of copper and hot chunks of metal playing with itself. I bet a handful of guys with some shovels and a dremel could seriously fuck up the productivity of a data center pretty easy.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 14 hours ago

I truly do not know what their long term plan is, assuming they even have one (bold assumption, I know) but it seems to me that having huge masses of unemployed people with tons of motivation and nothing better to do is like, the last thing I would be pushing for if I was of the ownership class.

Within a few years, sooner than people think, the sub-5% unemployment rate will be a quaint memory. We will hit double digit unemployment rates, as you are predicting, and the number will only rise.

Whether the losses to society are made up with some sort of a "robot tax," or UBI, or something else, will entirely depend on the party in charge, but under MAGA, those things won't be happening.

Under MAGA, social safety nets will be transactional. If you need government assistance, you will be required to work for it, and you will be assigned to one of the work camps, where you will be leased out to corporations as a Federal 13th Amendment Worker, called 13s (a system that will lead to more unemployment).

Further, personal situations like debt, unemployment, homelessness, etc. will be illegal, and you will be sent to the work camps.

If you refuse to work, are insubordinate, cause trouble, try to foment Insurrection, etc. you will be sent to the brand new, state-of-the-art prison being built right now in Guantanamo Bay (haven't heard of it? Google it), never to be heard of again.

Or, alternatively, you could always volunteer to fight in Middle East War.

This is for the good of the citizens. It is immoral to take money you haven't worked for, and working in the government camps is no more than a supplement to your public school education, adopting a proper work ethic so you can contribute positively to society. That's how regular citizens can preserve Freedom.

Work will make you Free: "Arbeit Macht Frei." How inspirational. They should put that over the front gate.

[–] null@lemmy.org 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If a facility truly consumes resources at such a rate that it increases local prices then they should be taxed at a rate that would cover the difference for the community they are entering.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Around me it's not so much that the data centers use so much that it raises the price for everyone. It's that the state government wants their business so bad that it has agreed to raise the prices of utilities (water and electricity) for everyone living around the area to subsidize the operational cost of the datacenters. Our electricity bill is up 30% from 2024 and most of the datacenters are still under construction

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really don't get the kowtowing to data centers in particular, like I get it if they're payed off properly but when they aren't then why? It's kinda like the Noah's Ark BS in Kentucky where the locals gave Ken Ham the fucken world and it's brought in basically no runoff business. Why do local politicians do this, for all the money they waste on shit like this they could create local grant programs and spin up a bunch of local businesses.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do local politicians do this

Because too many people in the US only vote once every 4 years in national elections and don't pay attention to their local ones.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I meant why do they do this without the pay side of things. I get corruption since it directly benefits the individual but without that its just stupid. There's no gain and you risk making yourself a target if folks get pissed off enough.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you risk making yourself a target if folks get pissed off enough

They would have to be paying attention enough to notice, first. Sinclair and others steadily gobbling up local tv and radio stations has created local news deserts across the nation.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People notice their power bills and the horrid white noise these things make. Frankly speaking the propaganda only does so much, and just not acknowledging it does nothing towards the narrative.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I only found out about our county trying to sneak a data center in after the plan had already been withdrawn. They were working on all of it in closed meetings but fortunately some folks found out and when they brought it out in the open where the community would see, it quickly disappeared. Now we're all on watch for when they try this shit again.

Fucken A. Good for you and your lot, frankly the only way such a situation could go any better is also illegal.

This is America you're talking about....

[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Curing the symptoms and ignoring the disease

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The disease is fueled by datacenters.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The disease is too much money in the hands of a few who only chase further gains, damaging everyone else

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

And you don’t think datacenters are involved in providing the money? 😶