this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
401 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

20984 readers
1885 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These findings highlight both the promise and the limitations of AI in language education, underscoring the importance of teacher facilitation and thoughtful design of human–AI interaction to support deep and sustainable learning.

The problem is there's no teachers in this scenario, at least that's my understanding

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're right, they will have "guides" instead of teachers. This might be to far, but we won't know until they try it. A mix of human and AI teachers would probably be best.