this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
893 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

83077 readers
6536 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

This isn't really space science related, just commercialization. And about focusing on Earth: we should let scientists work on what they're passionate about, IMO they'll be more motivated to research their field of choice

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

we should let scientists work on what they're passionate about

*fund them

Why is it always 100x more on useless destruction and military? And yeah i know the sad answer already.

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

By work I meant study, not necessarily being employed by a company if that's what you meant

[–] Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

True, that is how we got unit 731.

[–] cole@lemdro.id -3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

SpaceX has developed laundry list of new technology to enable Starlink and other endeavors. It's silly to discount that as worthless.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

If your scientific discovery disproportionately benefits a few billionaires then it's worse than worthless.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

AND makes life far worse for literally the entire planet.

Imagine unilaterally deciding that increasing your already obscene fortune is more important than every living creature that will ever exist in the future having a sky to enjoy, ever again. To these people, human joy is not something worth preserving.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 2 points 2 hours ago

Dude is so cartoonishly evil that it hurts

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

lol just so you know a "laundry list" is a list of bad things.

And no, rockets that can put stuff into orbit where around even before Mama Musk shat out lil Mech-Hitler.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 1 points 3 hours ago

Not like these ones. I'm almost tired of having this discussion y'all are blinded by hatred.

First full flow staged combustion engine, dramatically lower launch prices than competitors (cheaper for the government and has enabled more interesting things to go to space), dramatically more access (SpaceX flies multiple times a week!), booster recovery & rocket reuse.

And again I know everyone really is blinded by their seething rage but starship is going to change the whole landscape again.

You can hate the man as much as you want, I'm not saying I don't. But you discredit yourself by not knowing what SpaceX is actually doing.

I mean, we still wouldn't have US access to space without SpaceX (Boeing fiasco...).