this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
920 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

83077 readers
7647 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 57 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I was a space kid, followed every space shot since 1965, was a super fan of Apollo 11, I had a subscription to Nat Geo growing up, just for the Space photos.

So I can't believe I'm saying this: Maybe we've gone far enough for now, and we should have a moratorium on space for the next 50 years.

We should concentrate on Earth for awhile, dontcha think?

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

This isn't really space science related, just commercialization. And about focusing on Earth: we should let scientists work on what they're passionate about, IMO they'll be more motivated to research their field of choice

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

we should let scientists work on what they're passionate about

*fund them

Why is it always 100x more on useless destruction and military? And yeah i know the sad answer already.

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

By work I meant study, not necessarily being employed by a company if that's what you meant

[–] Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

True, that is how we got unit 731.

[–] cole@lemdro.id -3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

SpaceX has developed laundry list of new technology to enable Starlink and other endeavors. It's silly to discount that as worthless.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

If your scientific discovery disproportionately benefits a few billionaires then it's worse than worthless.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

AND makes life far worse for literally the entire planet.

Imagine unilaterally deciding that increasing your already obscene fortune is more important than every living creature that will ever exist in the future having a sky to enjoy, ever again. To these people, human joy is not something worth preserving.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

To these people, human joy is an indulgence for the weak.

You know how over-exaggerated cartoonish villains will talk about how love and caring make you weak? Basically that.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

That's because he's an ogre who has to pay women to be artificially inseminated because, they won't go anywhere near him, and his weener won't work anyhow, due to botched enlargement surgery.

Just repellant.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 2 points 5 hours ago

Dude is so cartoonishly evil that it hurts

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

lol just so you know a "laundry list" is a list of bad things.

And no, rockets that can put stuff into orbit where around even before Mama Musk shat out lil Mech-Hitler.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 1 points 6 hours ago

Not like these ones. I'm almost tired of having this discussion y'all are blinded by hatred.

First full flow staged combustion engine, dramatically lower launch prices than competitors (cheaper for the government and has enabled more interesting things to go to space), dramatically more access (SpaceX flies multiple times a week!), booster recovery & rocket reuse.

And again I know everyone really is blinded by their seething rage but starship is going to change the whole landscape again.

You can hate the man as much as you want, I'm not saying I don't. But you discredit yourself by not knowing what SpaceX is actually doing.

I mean, we still wouldn't have US access to space without SpaceX (Boeing fiasco...).

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I dunno, every engineer not working on space almost certainly ends up optimizing some sort of ad delivery system. The tech industry is almost completely enshittified.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I was thinking more like Climate Change and Infrastructure and whatnot and suchlike.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

That’s great, but that comes from funding those things, not shutting down a different industry. It’d be better to shut down non-productive industries like bombing brown kids in the Middle East.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Not gonna happen. Not with the effective altruist cult running things.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think you are using altruist right, or I am missing some sarcasm here.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of the ultra wealthy espouse a nonsense philosophy called "Effective Altruism", which asserts a kind of utilitarian "most good for the most people" ethic, but in such a way that one can basically justify any action as being, eventually, for the most good ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Including being good to hypothetical, unlikely trillions that may live someday if we colonize Mars.

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

I've been really passionate about space. My bday is on the anniversary of the moon landing, and my one aunt has always reminded me of the fact. My great grandfather worked for NASA and my aunt gave me his stargazing binoculars that his brother gave him when he got hired at NASA. That part of my family instilled a huge love of science in me, esp space stuff. I wanna go to space more than anything, but I don't have the brains or constitution to be an astronaut. So I just daydream, stargaze, and write poems about the cosmos.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

maybe just for this one guy you know

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Believe it or not, you can do two things at once. Some people are interested in space, some in geology. That's fine.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

i just tried to chew gum and walk and my personal injury attorney would like to know your address (they think you're cute)

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Kinda missing the point there.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 hours ago
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Right. Elon hires people on the basis they'll be making Mars travel possible, but that Starship is really for dumping metal all over the night sky.