this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
86 points (100.0% liked)

neurodiverse

1966 readers
158 users here now

What is Neurodivergence?

It's ADHD, Autism, OCD, schizophrenia, anxiety, depression, bi-polar, aspd, etc etc etc etc

“neurologically atypical patterns of thought or behavior”

So, it’s very broad, if you feel like it describes you then it does as far as we're concerned


Rules

1.) ableist language=post or comment will probably get removed (enforced case by case, some comments will be removed and restored due to complex situations). repeated use of ableist language=banned from comm and possibly site depending on severity. properly tagged posts with CW can use them for the purposes of discussing them

2.) always assume good faith when dealing with a fellow nd comrade especially due to lack of social awareness being a common symptom of neurodivergence

2.5) right to disengage is rigidly enforced. violations will get you purged from the comm. see rule 3 for explanation on appeals

3.) no talking over nd comrades about things you haven't personally experienced as a neurotypical chapo, you will be purged. If you're ND it is absolutely fine to give your own perspective if it conflicts with another's, but do so with empathy and the intention to learn about each other, not prove who's experience is valid. Appeal process is like appealing in user union but you dm the nd comrade you talked over with your appeal (so make it a good one) and then dm the mods with screenshot proof that you resolved it. fake screenies will get you banned from the site, we will confirm with the comrade you dm'd.

3.5) everyone has their own lived experiences, and to invalidate them is to post cringe. comments will be removed on a case by case basis depending on determined level of awareness and faith

4.) Interest Policing will not be tolerated in any form. Support your comrades in their joy!

Further rules to be added/ rules to be changed based on community input

RULES NOTE: For this community more than most we understand that the clarity and understandability of these rules is very important for allowing folks to feel comfortable, to that end please don't be afraid to be outspoken about amendments and addendums to these rules, as well as any we may have missed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), including those who otherwise require less support, face severe difficulties in everyday social interactions. Research in this area has primarily focused on identifying the cognitive and neurological differences that contribute to these social impairments, but social interaction by definition involves more than one person and social difficulties may arise not just from people with ASD themselves, but also from the perceptions, judgments, and social decisions made by those around them. Here, across three studies, we find that first impressions of individuals with ASD made from thin slices of real-world social behavior by typically-developing observers are not only far less favorable across a range of trait judgments compared to controls, but also are associated with reduced intentions to pursue social interaction. These patterns are remarkably robust, occur within seconds, do not change with increased exposure, and persist across both child and adult age groups. However, these biases disappear when impressions are based on conversational content lacking audio-visual cues, suggesting that style, not substance, drives negative impressions of ASD. Collectively, these findings advocate for a broader perspective of social difficulties in ASD that considers both the individual’s impairments and the biases of potential social partners.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BironyPoisoned@hexbear.net 1 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

No society or region has ever found asymmetric faces attractive. There is always minor variances of preferences, no one denies that. But in no world will someone considered horrifically ugly be considered a catch elsewhere.

Just another person justifying their hatred because they don't want to admit their biases.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 4 points 14 hours ago

i'm ND but ok. asymmetrical hair has been popular at various times, no reason that couldn't expand to faces in a better society not dominated by american capitalist media.

Not the best group to emulate but fencing scars used to be desirable among aristocrats.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

And you are just looking for another excuse to justify your depression and misanthropy. See how easy this game is to play?

Don't just accuse people of operating under bad faith, unless you, yourself want to be accused of it.

Nothing they said was wrong. And you aren't wrong either. However, we don't know exactly what a future industrialized classless society will look or act like, and assuming data from our current societies is exactly the same kind of thin-slice bullshit people in this thread are accusing NT people of doing.

The fact of the matter is that in archeological evidence, we have evidence for horrifically maimed or disabled people being well cared for even in hunter gatherer societies. We also have evidence of certain societies practicing the kind of mass cannibalism that would sell well in a Victorian drama. It's a mixed bag.

Humans are extremely complex social creatures who both manipulate, and are manipulated by, their environment. This means that reckless optimism or pessimism about 'human nature' is entirely unwarranted.

[–] BironyPoisoned@hexbear.net 1 points 2 hours ago

Don't just accuse people of operating under bad faith, unless you, yourself want to be accused of it.

I don't care what you accuse me of, I care about what best reflects current reality.

However, we don't know exactly what a future industrialized classless society will look or act like,

I think all of recorded history is enough of a time slice to make a best guess. Your comment amounts to nothing more than hopeful optimism when everything we have says otherwise.

we have evidence for horrifically maimed or disabled people being well cared for even in hunter gatherer societies.

"Stop complaining about people you meet thinking you're less of a person for being ugly! Your family doesn't let you starve to death so actually we're good people." You have no idea how these people were treated beyond their continued survival. At best, you can say that family and friends are willing to overlook stuff like this. But that doesn't change the fact that every new person you meant instinctually judges you as lesser.