this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
90 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

42261 readers
138 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I still want natgas for cold, windless winter weeks.

[–] folaht@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Include battery-exhausted to windless and I agree,
but natgas fanboys will still claim that solar power "doesn't work" and "can't ever replace natgas".

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why? Why do people constantly claim that the only way to generate baseline power is by releasing fossil fuels and burning things?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No. Not baseline. Standby capacity for when it's cloudy, still, dry and all battery capacity has been used up.

Maybe we only need natural gas for, say, 10 hours per year, but in those hours we really need it

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 minutes ago

Maybe there is a better electricity mix that doesn't rely on fossil fuels "just in case."