this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
138 points (98.6% liked)

Europe

10765 readers
1575 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] klangcola@reddthat.com 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Disappointing DW didn't include hydropower in the price comparison graphic. Also would have been interesting to see where offshore wind stacks up, though tbh I'm not sure the math is even in yet for offshore wind

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 16 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

The issue with hydropower is that you can only build as much hydropower as your geography allows, and it can come with severe environmental repercussions if you go too hard.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Hydro is a good complement to solar and wind. I am customer of an utility company which delivers 100% renewables, with help of hydro - Elektrizitätswerke Schönau. And they are not more expensive than others - rather, they could keep prices stable during the Ukraine war gas crisis, which led to very high costs for electricity contracts. This is the mix they use. Extremely nice and competent company!

I still prefer to switch on large appliances like dishwasher and laundromat at the times with the highest proportion of renewables in the German grid. That's usually at 2 pm (14:00) on halfways sunny days, and 2 am (2:00) in times with a bit of wind. There is even a web site, peakpick.de, where you can look up the time of the day which has the most green energy on the phone. No need to pay a single Euro more than absolutely needed to companies that steal our future. Fuck them.

BTW I hate fossil industry astroturfing.

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 5 points 13 hours ago

I think the bigger point is that most places have built enough hydro infrastructure that any new hydro is neither cheap nor has a low impact on environment. The age of cheap and easy hydro is kinda gone.

Now we can still have partial upgrades and rebuilds to increase hydro capacity. Sadly, very few places are feasible with modern tech that weren't possible ~30-50 years ago

[–] klangcola@reddthat.com 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Hydro is definitely highly geography dependant, and certainly the environmental impact can be severe. Though there's also been great advancements in smaller scale "low head" hydro where you don't need to submerge half a valley or block migratory paths. Hence curiosity where hydro stacks up.

I suppose it's so geography dependant you can't make a meaningful global average to compare with other forms.

Then again in my particular neck of the woods solar is limited at best, for half the year. While the local landscape is nothing but mountains, valleys , lakes and rivers. So many lakes and rivers.

Another neat thing about hydro is that it's a renewable base load. Geothermal is another, but that's also highly geography dependant

[–] geissi@feddit.org 2 points 15 hours ago

Gravitation water vortex power plants seem to be more flexible and have less environmental impact than traditional hydro power.
Though the tech still seems to be in its early stages.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Another neat thing about hydro is that it’s a renewable base load

I think it goes even further, you can even use it as a long-term energy store, entirely disconnected from any rivers, possibly entirely underground which also avoids the environmental repercussions of blocking off rivers and creating big artificial lakes. I feel like this is an underresearched/underfunded field, solar power is kinda desperate for energy storage technologies especially in countries closer to the poles.

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 1 points 20 hours ago

It'd also complex, expensive, and takes many years to build.