790
submitted 1 year ago by Vuraniute@thelemmy.club to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] axont@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He was a professor at Harvard most of his career, if that explains anything. He's also on record calling the January 6th capitol thing a fascist coup attempt.

[-] ikilledtheradiostar@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Harvard, say no more fam

[-] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

I do think it was an attempt. They just didn’t even know that a coup attempt involved more than walking in the door and demanding Trump be president. The next one in America will involve mass killing, and it will be from a similar demographic.

[-] axont@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah we're still in a position where American fascism doesn't even recognize itself in the mirror. It doesn't realize it's a movement that needs coherent aims. It's still stuck in the American paradigm of politics as consumerism. A comrade the other day here said the explicit kind of American fascism is having a hard time getting off the ground because they refuse to adopt socialist rhetoric, like European fascist movements in the past.

[-] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Yea that’s well said, also American fascists luckily have no history to look back to that’s before the US state formation. So instead of wanting a new system, they just want their guy to play President as they sit on the couch.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If i remember his book correctly, at start he explicitly denies marxist definition of fascism, and then in course of the book his research lead straight to it being correct on at least two separate occasions, them makes full stop and end the topic when he realise what would he have to write next.

I don't know if thats merely ritually exorcising communism in order to have his book accepted by liberal academia (like in case of Geza Alfoldy for example) or he really is this intellectually dishonest, because he clearly did realised. Anyway it was funny as hell and the book isn't even bad.

[-] axont@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Possibly because of the way he's found his career. Paxton is very popular in France and was very instrumental in introducing liberal historiography into French WW2 history. For him to throw a bone to Marxists would be undermining how he earned a name for himself in the first place.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah i see that in polish social sciences too, especially by older authors, it's hard here to keep position in the academia without paying at least lip service to anticommunist witchhunt. Unfortunately even those people are already dead and the new ones are not even shy about being opportunists, most books publish nowadays are almost worthless since it's either anticommunist propaganda, pophistory or bland compilations from older ones.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
790 points (85.8% liked)

Memes

45754 readers
1698 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS