1935
submitted 1 year ago by eee@lemm.ee to c/workreform@lemmy.world

As part of his Labor Day message to workers in the United States, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday re-upped his call for the establishment of a 20% cut to the workweek with no loss in pay—an idea he said is "not radical" given the enormous productivity gains over recent decades that have resulted in massive profits for corporations but scraps for employees and the working class.

"It's time for a 32-hour workweek with no loss in pay," Sanders wrote in a Guardian op-ed as he cited a 480% increase in worker productivity since the 40-hour workweek was first established in 1940.

"It's time," he continued, "that working families were able to take advantage of the increased productivity that new technologies provide so that they can enjoy more leisure time, family time, educational and cultural opportunities—and less stress."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 year ago

Apart from the mystical horse, those aren't fantastical things. France has a 35 hour work week, many countries have 4 weeks vacation as the norm, and most rich countries have full healthcare coverage. These are policy choices, not impossible dream worlds.

[-] mrnotoriousman@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

It's sad that over here in America people are conditioned to think they are fantastical things.

[-] severien@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

In Europe, 4 weeks is the absolute minimum, many countries have higher mandated minimums and people get often extra on top. There are many things wrong in Europe, but the vacation policy is decent.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Err, what is your main criticisms about Europe?

[-] severien@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Regarding employment.

It's pretty much given that the pension system of many countries will collapse, so young people are paying into a system which they either won't be able to use or will be heavily disadvantaged. IMHO the pension system should be (at least partially) privatized, but it's of course too late, damage is done.

Income is taxed too heavily and wealth too little. These days it's pretty much impossible to buy a house for many families even though the population doesn't grow and new houses are being built. You can't amass wealth with work, only woth inheritance.

Some worker protection laws should be weakened, specifically laying off people is often pretty much impossible which makes people allocation inefficient and companies conservative.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1935 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

10134 readers
572 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS