240
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

America: get sent home if your skirt is too short

France: get sent home if your dress is too long

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

One of them is a misogynstic state which criminalises abortions in parts of the country, another state is activelly fighting misogyny.

[-] HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Except that this is supposedly don't because it's seen as a religious thing. Don't get me wrong, I'm against Islamic people forcing women to wear certain things. It is oppressive. But that's not what this is. They are seeing it as a religious piece of clothing, and banning it for being a religious piece of clothing. And it's not even strictly a religious piece of clothing.

It's also just the dress. We aren't talking about any sort of head or face covering. But the dress.

There's a few layers to this, but none of it is "France is fighting against Islamic misogyny"

[-] Aux@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Please stop white-washing misogynsts!

[-] HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's the dumbest thing I've seen in these entire comments

Edit: Since I've got almost nothing going on at work, let me try and explain my point of view. It might be hard to follow an adult conversation, but maybe try.

They are not banning this for any moral reason about misogyny. To champion it for that reason is dumb because that's not what's happening. I'm personally a fan of talking about things happening as they are happening. We are not seeing France fight Islam and the way they oppress women. It's them saying people can't wear religious things. This includes things like a cross necklace, or a yamaka. Personally, I am agaisnt this. I don't think it should be the schools decision on things like that. Secularism in a system doesn't have to be against these things. It just means the rules are written without influence from them. I don't think religious clothes hurt peope simply for being religious. I don't get offended if someone wears a cross necklace or something like that.

But this also means it's not them fighting for women. It's just them being against religious articles of clothing over all

"So you're pro women being forced to wear it?!"

No. I'm actually pretty anti-theistic. More so with the Abraham's religions. I was actually raised Mormon, and while not as extreme as Islam, they do have very similar views on modesty with women that they don't extent anywhere near to the same extent with men. So I have seen the harm things like this cause. And I agree that it is a choice, but also not really since they are taught this is the way to live and to not do so makes you a terrible person. That if they don't cover their porn shoulders they're gonna get pregnant and have STDs. Shit like that fucks with women.

However, I don't think it's the schools job to do that. I can understand and agree with head coverings. But if it's just the dress, then no.

There's also the aspect that, as others have pointed out, it's not just religious. It's also cultural. If you grow up in those regions, even if you're not Islamic, you would likely still wear one. Because it's just a part of their culture. Just like how jeans and t-shirts are fairly common in the US. I lived in Florida, and flip flops were fairly common. Moved up north, and not so much. Different cultures have certain types of clothing that are fairly common. It doesn't have to be religious. So in that aspect I think it's also a oversight in that some might not be wearing it for cultural reasons so much as it's just what they wear.

None of this means I support misogyny. I just don't beleive in an oppressive government doing things like this. If they don't like it, then they should implement a law where students wear a uniform.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

That's some typical "pro-life" bullshit. Bye.

[-] HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So you're a bot. Got it.

"I don't think the schools should decide if kids can wear religious clothing or not"

"That means you're against abortions"

My dude, fucking what?

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Ahah, ook. "Pro-life" bot calls people around bots. GJ.

[-] HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Thanks for proving my point lol

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
240 points (97.2% liked)

World News

38492 readers
3278 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS