337
submitted 1 year ago by mambabasa@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

Democracy at work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CaliguLlama@feddit.nl 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most Dutch people don't like what these activists are doing.

Source?

blocking access to one of our biggest cities and one of the most beloved beaches

Yeah because the only way to get to Scheveningen is to take that small piece of highway? How about any of the other ways leading into or around The Hague? They aren't blocking access to The Hague or Scheveningen, there isn't one singular road in or out.

It's quite likely that our Parliament will pass a law similar to the UK to criminalize the blocking of infrastructure.

Source?

Don't pretend to speak for the rest of our country because you obviously don't and don't dramatize the blockage of a small section of 'highway' in the middle of a city as being a blockage of access to the entire city.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Source: Dutch news.

80% of people disagree with this action.

https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/panel/artikel/5406350/70-procent-wil-af-van-fossiele-subsidies-maar-nauwelijks-steun-voor

Don't be so confidently incorrect, it only proves how out of touch you are.

[-] Mananasi@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

I would have to imagine there is some selection bias for RTL nieuws. These numbers would probably look different if the NOS or EenVandaag did the survey.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Most of the time, they use the same Ipsos panels. But yes, I agree that RTL is less reliable than NOS. It's also about spin.

NOS reported that Parliament is considering jail time for disrupting infrastructure and that the UK already has it. Amnesty was against, but a political majority is quite likely.

[-] Redredme@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Source: am Dutch too. Can confirm. Listen to your own advice, you too are not talking for all of us.

Ook jij spreekt niet voor ons allemaal. Als dat zo was dan stonden er wel meer mensen op dat stuk weg, dan had die politie je niet weg gespoten.

Dit is niet de manier. Dit is gevaarlijk en dom.

[-] CaliguLlama@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

I know I don't speak for everyone, that's why you didn't find a single opinion or generalization in my comment ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

But if you want my opinion I think this is exactly the way they should be protesting right now. High visibility, on 'the doorstep' of the governmental buildings, non violent (unlike some other protests we've had lately by other groups) and only inconveniencing others.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
337 points (98.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5306 readers
494 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS