ISO8601

260 readers

1 users here now

Community dedicated to the international standard YYYY-MM-DD date format.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Solaki

What is the need of T in the new (2019) time format? (self.iso8601)

submitted 2 years ago by lambalicious to c/iso8601

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Basically title. 2019 edition of the Standard denotes the "T" prefix to time as mandatory (except in "unambiguous contexts"):

01:29:59 is now actually T01:29:59, with the former form now designated as an alternative

But date does not have a "D" prefix, not even in "ambiguous contexts".

1973-09-11 never needs to be something like eg.: D1973-09-11

Anyone know the reasoning behind this change and what is the intended use? The only time-only format with separators that I can think would be undecidable in ambiguous contexts would be hh:mm which I guess could be mistaken for bible verses?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] wesker 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I suspect the T acts as a delimiter. D is unnecessary, because the date is at the beginning of the string. And then Z is another delimiter, to separate the time from the timezone.

EDIT: I think I misunderstood your question, but I'll leave my post, in case it's useful to others when considering the sections of a full timestamp.

[–] mnw 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think you're probably right. If the format was

DATETTIMEZTIMEZONE

And you omit DATE you still have TTIME

[–] lambalicious 1 points 2 years ago

Hmmm those are good points. I feel this gels well with how in the syntax for durations / periods all unit delimiters are mandatory (also because they're tail) when the unit is present and the header / marker is P.

[–] sqw 2 points 2 years ago

I have always found the uppercase T/Z delimiters to make the timestamp less human-readable.