1077
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Joe Biden worries that the “extreme” US supreme court, dominated by rightwing justices, cannot be relied upon to uphold the rule of law.

“I worry,” the president told ProPublica in interview published on Sunday. “Because I know that if the other team, the Maga Republicans, win, they don’t want to uphold the rule of law.”

“Maga” is shorthand for “Make America great again”, Donald Trump’s campaign slogan. Trump faces 91 criminal charges and assorted civil threats but nonetheless dominates Republican polling for the nomination to face Biden in a presidential rematch next year.

In four years in the White House, Trump nominated and saw installed three conservative justices, tilting the court 6-3 to the right. That court has delivered significant victories for conservatives, including the removal of the right to abortion and major rulings on gun control, affirmative action and other issues.

The new court term, which starts on Tuesday, could see further such rulings on matters including government environmental and financial regulation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SpezBroughtMeHere@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

There's the problem. You think one party is inherently bad and one is inherently good. That's completely an idiotic take. But you're too stupid to see that.

[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The problem is you see this is a party issue rather than an American issue. Seems more like the only idiotic take here is your own.

[-] SpezBroughtMeHere@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That's my entire point. It isn't a party issue. The whole system needs flipped on its head. You've formed a rebuttal without even understanding the argument. Why?

[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

One party is objectively and cumulatively 'bad' in almost any comparative context by a reasonable observer, and you projected your own views onto others by making assumptions about how they define one party bad on party good. Your point was to dilute the issue so you can prop up the 'both sides' delusion while hurling personal insults at the op. Yeah, the whole system could use a reboot, but playing to that point as gotcha drive-by comments without solutions is just spewing word salad for the sake of typing more words. You are trolling.

The argument seems entirely ost on you in the first place. You don't understand how your assumptions and insults are the problem rather than 'the point'. Why?

[-] SpezBroughtMeHere@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Dude, your entire comment is based off assumptions. You think I don't understand the argument yet here you are completely clueless. You don't even know what 'the point' is. You're just mad because how dare someone criticize your favorite party. You've got one party full of bullshit and the other full of incompetence. If you support either one, you're an idiot.

[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You are intentionally ignoring that your assumptions and insults are the problem rather than ‘the point’. Why?

[-] SpezBroughtMeHere@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Neat. What are my assumptions and what is 'the point' that I am not getting?

[-] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You don't have to believe that to believe that the parties are not the same. "Inherent good" is a philosophical construct that isn't present in the real world- adopting a fatal nihilism in the face of that is the true idiocy.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
1077 points (96.7% liked)

News

23625 readers
3328 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS