286
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Would you be opposed to paying to use Lemmy? Someone's gotta pay them bills. Currently it seems to be donation focused, but that might not scale. So what's it going to be Player2@sopuli.xyz, ads, or a "premium Lemmy subscription"/tax/due/contribution?

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

I worry that donations may not be enough and people say that it's not expensive to run. Regardless, I don't think they're forcing me to identify myself and building profiles on me to sell to the highest bidder. I'll pay Lemmy for that.

If I pay Facebook and Reddit they'll do both even if they say otherwise because I believe they lack ethics.

[-] ram@bookwormstory.social 4 points 11 months ago

You can set up a Lemmy instance with just a docker file lmao it's not exactly a large scale operation to upkeep.
If somehow every Lemmy instance went paid only, I'd host my own instance and invite my friends to use it too.

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

This is basically just paying with your time/hardware/electricity rather than money.

[-] ram@bookwormstory.social 1 points 11 months ago

Okay? And currently people pay with donations. The suggestion from SkyNTP was, in the most condescending what, what would you do if it became a paid-subscription. Paying with your time or on donation are acceptable. Paying as a part of a subscription is not for me, and I imagine many in the FOSS-oriented fediverse.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

If this was the only path forward I wouldn't even be here. Thankfully it isn't because I can run my own server/community and just connect it to the feddiverse.

[-] Player2@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

I would argue that there is a fundamental difference to this forum style system consisting mostly of text and links, and a traditional 'social media' that is entirely photography and short form video. Correct me if I'm wrong, but TikTok, Facebook, etc. store all of the multimedia content on their services themselves, right? The costs cannot be comparable.

[-] stefanyas@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

Storage is a negligible cost for companies of this caliber. Infinite growth with infinite profit is the root cause of these problems.

[-] Player2@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

No way. Spinning rust isn't getting any cheaper these days and these companies are expected to not only serve all their existing content, but allow for free uploading and storing in perpetuity. Google is a great example of one of these massive companies trying desperately to reduce the amount they have to store. They recently ended the free Google photos backups and they are more aggressive with deleting inactive YouTube accounts.

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
286 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

57944 readers
2921 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS