SkyNTP

joined 2 years ago
[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Hear me out: what if repealing section 230 would end up killing our social media monoculture, since it would be impossible for these platforms to operate. Instead, what if people had to host their content themselves, you know, like we did back in the day, when the Internet was fun.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, is it even possible to manufacture a perfect cube? What is your defined tolerance? A cm? mm? μm? An atom?

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I hated Expedition 33's combat system, with a particular dislike for quick time event as a primary game mechanic.

FF7 remake combat is a great blend of action, strategy, with just a sprinkle of QTE. DOS II is a great example of turn-based combat.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

OP didn't specifically say "only use the parts that came out of the box". It's still ambiguous. Are official mods, like PRUSA MMU modifying? How about after market parts?

Let me propose a modification tier list:

  • M1 replace a part with a functionally identical one, e.g. replace worn nozzle.
  • M2 upgrade using an official kit provided by the manufacturer to a new, fully versioned design, e.g. Mk3 to Mk3S
  • M3 replace or add a part with an after market part to achieve improved or different performance, e.g. replace brass nozzle with hardened steel nozzle sold by third party
  • M4 replace a part designed by the community
  • M5 design and replace a part yourself for your own custom needs.

I've personally done all 5. I can't imagine everyone has done all tiers of modifications.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

There's something about AI images that just gives it away. A certain glossiness. Subjects are usually too perfect. I find this is even more obvious out in the wild.

I have a theory that AI images in the wild will mostly continue this trend because the people making these images like it that way. Deceiving people is not the only reason people make images.

Does AI enable deception? Sure, but so does Photoshop, and that is decades old. Arguably, Photoshop requires more effort, but it seems like AI image generators still require effort on the part of the humans, if nothing else to select images that can fool, at the cost of other desirable features in images.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

This is all kinda moot. There will be no companies to run when the economy crashes because there is no one to buy goods (or even to pay taxes to support government spending). It's a giant house of cards.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Neither. Version control and remote sync to your self hosted gitlab or gitea, or whatever (or no remote at all if you wanna go gambling with your hard drive).

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago (7 children)

AI, crypto, just like .com, are very much very real, valuable technologies that have and will continue to stick around and be used until we destroy ourselves, or something even more advanced comes along.

What was/is a grift, is all the stupid money and people around it that don't have a damn clue where the limits of the technologies actually lie, what kinds of real problems are solved and have been sold lies stop lies without doing their due diligence.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't do online gambling, so maybe I am missing an important detail here, but there's no recent development that would explain why online gambling would have an effect now, and not a year ago, or even 15 years ago.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't think you understand what being squeezed is like. There is no fighting back when you have no options.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago

Fuck Joey Mannarino and fuck his subhuman and parasitic takes.

 

This is currently my primary frustration with Connect: complete opaqueness regarding instances.

I understand that one design philosophy might argue that instances shouldn't matter, so why show it at all. But it does matter, especially on All, and in comments. I think at the current and near-term state of development, obscuring instances creates more confusion than it alleviates.

  • In this example, I have no idea what community this is. Where is "here"? "General" is a super broad category (does a multi-community even make sense for this type of community name?). Is this /c/general for a general purpose instance, or /c/general of an instance dedicated to a very specific topic? Is that instance worth checking out? Who knows?
  • Is this an instance I'm subscribed to yet?
  • is this the same /c/general I was in last time with a moderation policy and moderators I didn't like, or a new one?
  • Is my instance defederated from seal_of_approval and will they receive my message? Who knows?
  • Are most responders coming from lemmy.world, from sketchy instances loaded with bots or is there good traction from smaller instances? Is there instance brigading going on?
  • Is this an impersonator of seal_of_approval?
  • is this a specific community that spams a lot and I should block it?
  • What moderation rules apply to this instance?

I can't block entire instances myself...

I realize that a lot of these problems have some sort of workaround by drilling down into community details and profiles. Ain't nobody have time for that.

I realize that specific UI solutions could be introduced to tackle each of these problems individually in a user-friendly manner. But we're not there and who knows when we will get there.

view more: next ›