702

Donald Trump on Wednesday launched fresh vitriol against the judge and prosecuting attorney in his New York business fraud trial, carefully skirting a gag order imposed on him just a day prior.

Trump tried Tuesday to bully a court clerk, sharing false conspiracies about her as well as her personal information. Presiding Judge Arthur Engoron issued a gag order later that day prohibiting all parties involved in the case from publicly discussing court staff.

While Trump avoided mentioning court staff on Wednesday, he went all out with attacks against Engoron and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

“This is election interference. They made up a fake case, these fraudulent people,” Trump told reporters. “And the judge already knows what he’s gonna do. He’s a Democrat judge. In all fairness to him, he has no choice.… He’s run by the Democrats.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 174 points 1 year ago

Has there ever been a whiny crybaby like this guy before?

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 123 points 1 year ago

He’s the biggest victim-player in the entire world. Sure is odd how his fans think he’s ultra-masculine just because he’s also an overconfident bully.

[-] LarryTheMatador@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yep. I've had a couple relationships with people like that. Most recently, a gf who acted exactly like that... she'd blame all of our problems on me, never take accountability, never acknowledge that her actions or behavior could influence me too, was thrilled to criticize me but if I said anything about her (even very fair things where I shared blame) she'd either change the topic to something irrelevant to criticize me, or clam up or leave and then blame me for finding the conversation frustrating. Expected me to do all the housework, then blamed me for not doing enough. Spent most of her time on social media, blamed me for her not getting work done, was obsessed with things like "221 people wished me happy birthday on facebook!". Incredibly dysfunctional and infuriating after a while. Not like I'm an expert, but after watching 50 hours of NPD videos on YouTube she ticks all the boxes.

[-] LarryTheMatador@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nothing is ever their fault, they have never been wrong, and you are never good enough for them. Every story is either them being a badass or being a victim. Everything you do was to hurt them, you can't just be tired you are being lazy. You can't just want some alone time you are separating yourself from them.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh I didn't know one of my siblings had a lemmy account

[-] b00m@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

They also think his complete disregard and sexual misconduct towards women is super masculine

[-] nucleative@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Usually mankind doesn't give them a platform... but yeah of course there a lot of people who's lives run on blaming others.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

He's the whiniest. People come up to him. Big, strong men with tears in their eyes. They say "Sir, you whine more than anyone else!"

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

"Sir, it is very unfair how they treat you!!"
"Yes, unfair, very unfair..."

[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I tried to give you an extra upvote for this one 😆

[-] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Alex Jones pretty much pulled the same stunt and we all saw how well that played out for him

[-] bibliotectress@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

Kinda fine so far? As of a couple of weeks ago, he still hadn't paid a dime to any of the Sandy Hook families because he declared bankruptcy. He's still spending a bunch of money and still doing Info Wars. It'll probably catch up to him eventually? I hope? https://apnews.com/article/alex-jones-sandy-hook-shooting-bankruptcy-34192bd7d89ed786f64580682f6ea89e

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 year ago

It's wild how gentle the courts are with the rich and powerful doing absolutely abhorrent shit on massive scales

But find a joint roach on a poor person unfortunate enough to not have light skin, and they're near instantly thrown into jail for years and years

I don't know how anybody can not think that the justice system is broken

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

So first off, yes rich people have HUGE advantages in court. That being said, the clear difference here is that civil trials and criminal trials function very differently and on wildly different timetables.

It's QUITE fast, generally speaking, to start a civil processing and much slower to actually see restitution, and the exact opposite is true for criminal cases.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Considering he openly admitted that he was going to hide his money in offshore accounts so the victims won't get it, he's still spouting conspiracy nonsense on infowars, and has maintained exactly the same lifestyle he had before, I'd say it went pretty well for him.

People severely overestimate the impact that these cases have had against people like Alex Jones and Steve Bannon. They may have had some bumps in the road, and a bunch of lawyers made a bunch of money. But in the end, these guys are still able to keep on keeping on.

[-] frizop@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is what I keep telling people. If you lose in court and the effective outcome is nil, nothing really happened.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile the rest of us aren't treated like we are drugking mafia dons for missing a hundred dollars on our tax return or bring slightly over the limit. It's fucking pathetic, they bully downwards.

[-] FrostbyteIX@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Elon Musk kinda comes to mind, but Trump shits all over what Musk has done....

[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What a trainwreck of a man. He could have just let SpaceX do it's thing and pretend he was the super tech genius behind it and be loved for life. In a way I am glad, him messing around with Twatter and Tesla keeps him distracted from breaking the one smart investment he ever made.

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
702 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2356 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS