870

Rolling coal is the practice of tampering with a vehicle's emissions control system, causing it to spew black clouds of sooty exhaust.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Not sure it's specifically eBay that should get the fine here, it should be the sellers ON eBay.

[-] MSids 24 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Nobody wants the eBay police, but sellers and buyers should be the ones held accountable.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 7 points 1 year ago

Yes exactly. No online platform can catch 100% of prohibited activity. They are punishing the wrong people. What they should do is get a list of all the ones eBay missed, file charges against the seller and start knocking on buyer's doors. Or maybe send some agents in an undercover Prius to pull them over and issue a fine when they get coal rolled. That would send a pretty clear message that eBay is not a safe place to purchase these items.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

so, you are right and wrong, due to the structure of the American legal system those DIRECT at fault are fines/sued first, then they are supposed to turn around and file a suit for damages against the next party down the line, so eBay should sue the seller.

same thing in motor vehicle incidents, if a car A and B are waiting in traffic and car C rearends car B to the point it hits car A, the man in car A is supposed to sue the guy in car B who then sues the guy in car C for damages

[-] Arsecroft 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So ebay, who profited from the sale of these devices, shouldn't be held accountable?

Did ebay stop any listings for these devices? It seems like if they were trying to stop this market, they would have stopped some number above zero, right?

Try selling a human limb on ebay and see how quickly your listing is removed, not that I'm bitter or anything.

edit: it kinda seems like they were trying to be compliant.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

You're responsible for what people on your platform do.

Here I thought the modern internet is able to exist because platforms specifically are not responsible for what its users do.

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

It's illegal for imgur to host illegal images I can see why eBay would be responsible for people selling illegal items.

[-] timetraveller@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Imgur hosts the images vs eBay only hosts the information, the sellers ship the product to the buyer

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

big thing about Ebay is they often also process the transactions

[-] timetraveller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Very good point.

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Hosting is hosting and images are information.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Imgur has to take down the illegal image when requested to do so. Imgur isn't charged for having a user upload an illegal image.

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

This is the part that bothers me too. Assuming they haven't been asked to remove them already that is.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sort of. They essentially have to be given the opportunity to take corrective action but if they don't then they get fine. Or indeed other things depending on the severity of what's happening.

See Reddit and all the subs they were eventually forced to shut down.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

To a point, I suspect that applies to speech things, not necessarily physical items.

But that's a good question, I don't know where the line lies.

[-] dym_sh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

the line lies where you start harming other people (and their habitat), that's literally the definition.

your freedom ends where my freedom begins

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah but what if I'm an idiot redneck then other people aren't allowed freedoms. Only me.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hmm. While I agree generally, your response seems a little vague. Definition of...? Freedom?

I'm saying I wonder where, formally, a company goes from being an information platform, to something else. That's the very point at which ebay started becoming liable for what people did on their systems.

They're not just hosting pictures, they're selling real-world items to circumvent laws in a visibly annoying way. People in CA get away with uncovered high intensity off-road aux lights because nobody's really abused them.

Coal-rollers like being obvious, stinky dickheads, hence the crackdown on both sales and installations.

[-] trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

The banks are getting away with murder.

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

While you're right, they do also have extensive KYC checks in place for this reason.

[-] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And that's hardly a good thing either.

[-] arin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If someone sells cocaine on eBay does ebay get fined? How about illegal porn?

this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
870 points (99.0% liked)

News

23409 readers
3052 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS