1260
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rendh@feddit.de -2 points 1 year ago

I'm not arguing for Israel being the good guy, just for genocide to be melodramatic. They treat them like enemies, which with a support of 60%+ for hamas which declared goal is to drive all Jews (not only the rightwing asshats) into the sea.

Hamas and many Palestinians celebrate the deaths of Jewish civilians. Since even before Israel existed there have been multiple attempts to bring all sides together. There were offers where Palestine would've been its own nation with the capital being in eastern Jerusalem. They refused every single time. You want intent? The clear intent of hamas is the extermination of every single Jew in the region without exception. Both sides are bad and the Israeli government is far from innocent. But I only see one group celebrating when civilians get killed. And I only see one group thinking the Holocaust didn't go far enough.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m not arguing for Israel being the good guy, just for genocide to be melodramatic.

It's not melodrama, it fits the UN definition of a genocide, but if you think "ethnic cleansing" is more appropriate, I'm willing to compromise.

They treat them like enemies, which with a support of 60%+ for hamas which declared goal is to drive all Jews (not only the rightwing asshats) into the sea.

Palestinians support Hamas not because of their ideals, but because they are the only one's that pretend to fight for them. Israel's kill count is orders of magnitude higher than Hamas'. How many Palestinians would vote for Hamas if there were fair, anonymous elections in Palestine is impossible to tell. You are extrapolating Hamas' extremism to the general population and basing it on surveys from a prison camp.

Since even before Israel existed there have been multiple attempts to bring all sides together. There were offers where Palestine would’ve been its own nation with the capital being in eastern Jerusalem. They refused every single time.

True, because their Holy Scripture tells them it's their land which is ironically the same reasoning Israel uses to stake a claim on the region.

The clear intent of hamas is the extermination of every single Jew in the region without exception.

Yes, and the clear intent of Israel is to exterminate every single Palestinian. That's why they are huddled up in Gaza and the West Bank, guarded by the IDF. They are not allowed to enter Israel and Egypt refuses to let them enter their territory as well.

And I only see one group thinking the Holocaust didn’t go far enough.

The only group I see thinking the Holocaust didn't go far enough is the West by continuing to give military support to Israel so they can continue with theirs.

Hamas and many Palestinians celebrate the deaths of Jewish civilians.

But I only see one group celebrating when civilians get killed

I'm gonna address this last because those are loaded points, but they seem very important for your opinion on the conflict.

Palestinians live in a world, devoid of any hope or future. They have no way of sustaining themselves, they have no way to escape, they have no way to fulfill what they think is their destiny (living under their God in Palestine). Israel on the other hand got their destiny with wide support from predominantly the US and the UK, but also the Western world as a whole.

I understand and empathize with the desperation of the Palestinian civilians and cheering on the deaths of your obvious enemy is not something exclusive to them, I've seen that happening many times, even from more privileged positions. What I mean by this is that US citizens cheer for their military successes, so do their opponent. People even do that by proxy in conflicts they have no personal interest in. At this point, I would just call it a human trait when being confronted with a shit situation, the deep end of the human soul so to speak.

[-] Rendh@feddit.de -2 points 1 year ago

The extermination of Palestinians clearly isn't their goal. Allowing the population of Palestinians to grow from 1 million to 5 million would otherwise look pretty foolish.

But why is Egypt refusing to let them in? Maybe because they don't want to deal with Hamas either?

A population growing to 5 times the size it was before clearly does not fit the definition of genocide. Am I agreeing with how Palestinians are treated? No. But calling it a genocide when the population has been growing and growing is ridiculous.

The comment about the west I'll ignore because it makes you look like a tanky.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But why is Egypt refusing to let them in? Maybe because they don’t want to deal with Hamas either?

Because if they try, Israel is shelling the Rafah border

No. But calling it a genocide when the population has been growing and growing is ridiculous.

Yeah, not enough sand people died, great point.

The comment about the west I’ll ignore because it makes you look like a tanky.

Tankie with ie.

Tut mir leid, dass ich deine Zeit verschwendet hab, Brudi. Wir kommen hier nicht auf einen Nenner. Hab noch nen Paragraphen zu meiner Antwort vorher hinzugefügt, wenn du es lesen magst.

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Sand people? Sick

this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
1260 points (96.2% liked)

News

23409 readers
3062 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS