1522
submitted 10 months ago by Veedem@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] quantumriff@lemmy.world 65 points 10 months ago

This would be better if they also limited their own terms in the bill

[-] Romanmir@lemmy.today 12 points 10 months ago

I’m pretty sure that’s a state-by-state thing. I’m also pretty sure that some states already have some term limits.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You would be right on both counts.

That being said, term limits for members of Congress to solve anything is one of those things that sound good on the surface but could actually make everything even worse.

It's supposed to decrease corruption by incumbents being less entrenched, but it could be the cause of much MORE corruption by making the revolving door between corrupt business interests and corrupt politics spin faster..

[-] Pasta4u@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Could just add in sensible term limits of like 10-20 years. Also not allow them to own stock

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Except the first one wouldn't work, for the reason described above.

Banning them from holding stock would probably help a lot, though. Too bad that it won't happen as long as oil boy Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi's even more corrupt protégé are the Dem leaders of the two Chambers and their Republican counterparts continue to be even worse 😮‍💨

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 10 months ago

Or at least not individual stocks.

Having a bog standard market tracker would be fine.

[-] Romanmir@lemmy.today 8 points 10 months ago

It would also force out politicians that might actually be effective.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah, exactly!

IMO, ranked choice voting, publicly (and only publicly) funded elections and outlawing partisan and otherwise discriminating gerrymandering would be much better solutions.

Will probably never happen though, since the people in charge of reforming the system are themselves amongst the main beneficiaries of the corruption inherent in the system 🤦

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
1522 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4350 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS