75
submitted 1 year ago by Azzu@lemm.ee to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

And if so, why exactly? It says it's end-to-end encrypted. The metadata isn't. But what is metadata and is it bad that it's not? Are there any other problematic things?

I think I have a few answers for these questions, but I was wondering if anyone else has good answers/explanations/links to share where I can inform myself more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lojcs@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

That doesn't explain why asymmetric encryption is insecure? In fact signal seems to be using two pairs of asymmetric keys to generate its symmetric secret, so it would also be prone to attack if asymmetric encryption was a flawed system.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess I missed your initial conversations question, but this is easy to search, and not for me to defend WhatsApp. I'm not the harbinger of bad news here, I'm just telling you what everyone else has said on the internet. WhatsApp is not private. They cooperate with governments to make messages known even.

I feel like you're trying to drive a point home that has already lost in the security commutat as a hole. OP asked if WhatsApp is bad for privacy, and it is.

Edit: just to shut you up - https://propertyofthepeople.org/document-detail/?doc-id=21114562

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
75 points (89.5% liked)

Privacy

31609 readers
281 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS