1078
Texas Republicans Ban Women From Using Highways for Abortion Appointments
(www.newsweek.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
1078 points (98.0% liked)
News
23680 readers
3321 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Does this include highways that receive federal funding? That’s a good way to get this repealed. Threaten to pull funding.
I feel like we should be pulling funding anyhow.
“Oh. You want to secede? Well about this. We’ll do a transitional period. We won’t send you money, and you won’t send us taxes. Talk to you in about a decade. Hope a hurricane doesn’t hit, cuz that’d suck… also, your citizens won’t be paying into or benefit from Social Security… and also? We’re setting up a customs control point on your border, and your people need a visa.
“Also you get to deal with Mexico if they choose to take steps because you’re an asshole.”
And… they can begin making payments on their share of the federal debt.
I mean, just cutting federal safety nets off would be sufficient to cause their economic collapse. The burden imposed by that alone would fuck texans over inside of a year or two.
then you have the infrastructure spending- the Port of Houston, for example. needs a massive 75 million dollar upgrade to be competitive. Cut out the federal spending for customs and security and that clown show becomes even worse. Also, removing it as a port of entry into the US proper-like means that people are far more likely to go to other ports. all of which combines to increased spending and decreased economic revenue.
There's really no reason to need to impose debt payments. their collapse is inevitable and they wouldn't be able to pay it anyhow. Further... their healthcare and schools are crap so they'd loose a lot of skilled workers as people leave.
one point, though. Remember one of the causes of ww2 was the sanctions imposed after ww1. I doubt it would spark ww3, but, it would cause... resentment.
Texas, as well as plenty other states, aren't even in full compliance with the ADA which is a law over 30 years old, it's an ongoing fight that really started with the legal case Olmstead vs LC and moved into the seeking of consent decrees in recent years. To my knowledge none of the states that are infracting the ADA have been threatened with funding revocation or financial penalties of any kind. I doubt money will play any part of this. They'll just run it through the courts until the people who are doing this dont have jobs anymore I'd wager, if they do anything at all.
The ADA doesn't interfere with the Commerce Clause.
The government will not dad dick you any faster than if you fuck with the Commerce Clause.