1103
submitted 8 months ago by ZWho63@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml

Here we go again...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 100 points 8 months ago

The guys was committed for two weeks and had threatened to shoot up a national guard base. They had the information to act on and take away his guns and they didn't because they didn't need to. This is even more fucked because it was probably avoidable.

[-] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 56 points 8 months ago

There are no red flag laws in Maine. There was no legal way to take his guns even if they thought that was necessary. Also, the christofacist supreme court is set to strike down laws that prevent people convicted domestic violence from owning guns, which will chip away at the legality of red flag laws everywhere. Happy Thursday everyone!

[-] _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If he was a reservist, I'm pretty sure his commander could've ordered him to surrender his weapons.

And the bar under the UCMJ to do deal with a suicidal/homicidal troop is way lower than what it is for a civilian.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee -3 points 8 months ago
[-] Schmuppes@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago
[-] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

People get wrapped around the axle about this. If you don't know the military doesn't turn you into John Wick. Most people in the military have never been issued a gun outside of qual, but all are given a bare minimum level of training just in case things got dire.

Annual (if that) weapons training is basically "don't tk your buddies 101" a bit of shooting to prove you can and cleaning after. You only get more if direct combat is your actual job, or will be soon.

Just like anything else if you want to get good you have to put in some effort on your own time.

[-] Schmuppes@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I read your reply as "He was a weapons instructor and therefore cannot burn a fuse and go on a psychotic rampage". I believe that is what the exchange was about before you replied. The question people are asking is "Why did he have guns" and not "How was he trained to use them".

[-] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That's not what I'm saying. He had a pretty good "why" for having easy access to weapons until he was checked into a mental institution. If he was a danger to himself or others I bet they could have prevented him from getting weapons. I'm interested to see why they chose not to or how their attempts failed.

I admit it was a deviation from the subject and might have been confusing. Every time this guy's background is brought up people tend to think military training is some forbidden knowledge that citizens don't have access to, which isn't the case at all.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 43 points 8 months ago

Almost all mass shootings were avoidable if that government really cared about solving this problem

[-] BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

They do care, just not as much as they care about those sweet NRA and Colt checks 😩

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1103 points (95.2% liked)

Memes

44147 readers
2979 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS