519
submitted 10 months ago by Salamendacious@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tb_@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

I know how to get my hands on things. Just because I haven't used it doesn't mean I can't form an opinion on the ethics behind it.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh but it does. Until you understand the practical and real world usage and application of the technology, and it's limitations, you're talking out your ass. Opinions are like assholes, everyone's got one and most are full of shit. I prefer objective reality over the imaginings of perpetually offended but wilfully ignorant people.

So I challenge you to recreate a traditional masterpiece with AI that is of the quality that traditional artists would respect in a style so accurate to be indiscernable for the real thing. I'll see you in undefined years, then congratulate you on accomplishing your task and respect the amount of knowledge and skill it would take to accomplish such a feat.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

What the fuck are you on about. Do you have some sort of superiority complex?

I don't need to prove my knowledge to you just because I haven't generated any images myself. I can be aware of all the other applications and limitations of such a tool. I'm not arguing that it isn't useful.

I'm arguing artists should have a say in whether their work gets absorbed into the black box or not. And if they don't get that choice, fair on them for trying to poison the system. Shouldn't have taken without asking if you didn't want that to happen.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And I'm saying you're wrong. Terrorists don't get to blow up social infrastructure because they don't get what they want. And you seem to miss the part where I'm one of those artists.

You're the sort to tear down babylon or burn the library of alexandria because they stored a copy of your work for the posterity and benefit of humanity.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I didn't miss that part. You're free to do with your art whatever you want.

But just because you are okay with your art getting repurposed for whatever doesn't mean others have to be.
And if the library were to store a copy of my book it'd come with royalties and credit, unlike whatever is going on with image generators.

Now if libraries were to stock an illegal copy of my book, I'd get pretty pissed about that. If they did that to all of the other writers as well I wouldn't even have to burn it down because the lawyers would do it for me.
But lone artists on the internet don't have a massive publisher to back them up.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Why do you hate libraries? Does DaVinci get royalties when I replicate his engineering work?

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Please quote me the part where I said or implied I hate libraries.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You've been defending people's right to burn them down all thread.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I have, at no point, implied legitimate businesses/organizations should be burned down.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

No you implied that other structures of communal data storage should be burned down; but for some reason you disingenuously disassociate those to others because of some self-perceived definition over what is legitimate knowledge.

AI is a librarian, datasets are the library. You want to set fire to the stacks, fuck everyone else's hard work.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

If AI were a librarian I'd be able to go there and find the works of whatever artists they kept copies of. Last I checked, that is not the case. Are you sure you know how these machine learning algorithms work?

If the AI is set fire to, all of the artists still keep their individual works or art on whatever websites they were before they got scraped.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If you can't define their individual works are they really there?

I can read and absorb Nietzsche, yet you won't find his books in my head.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

And no, DaVinci doesn't. That's why copyright expires and items go into the public domain after a set amount of years.

A "set" amount of years massive corporations have been all too happy to push back, but that's another conversation.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

So you're OK with burning down libraries as long as it's for Capitalism, makes more sense...

[-] tb_@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

I'm OK with libraries getting sued for ripping off writers/artists.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You don't know how libraries work, just like you don't understand AI.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Nah I think you're the one who doesn't know

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Don't conflate your ignorance with other people's knowledge. You think, because you don't know.

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
519 points (93.6% liked)

News

22831 readers
4143 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS