view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
You think America is "scientific and enlightened"? The way we "handled" COVID perfectly demonstrates why we aren't.
Oh, really? You mean the pandemic that hit when the religious party was in charge? That pandemic? The one whose handling began with the christian nationalists? That one?
The "religious" party in charge that disbelieves science and did as much as it could to hide the evidence of COVID?
Yes, that party is what proves America isn't "scientific and enlightened." Because our response to COVID would have been much better had the GOP not tried to sabotage as much of Obama's legacy as possible.
You're using the literal witch hunting party as the standard. I would wager they don't represent the average scientific belief of Americans. Hence why their abortion push is so unpopular.
So what's the standard, in your opinion, that delineates a "scientific" nation from an unscientific one? Because I would posit a country where more than 30% of its citizens don't believe in evolution or climate change, and who regularly get to control the government, doesn't meet that standard.
There is no fucking standard, we're all shitting the bed the world over. Look at the Middle East, does that look like a bastion of scientific thought? Not in the last 1,000 years? What about the British Isles? Oh? The Tories are making a cumback? Nazis? In my Germany again? Its shit all over, dude. We left the Tau long ago.
Tens of millions of lives saved with science and technology. I'd say that's a pretty good result, considering what happened last time.
We could have saved tens of millions more had we listened to scientific experts, rather than letting right-wing conspiracies hamstring our pandemic response.
Also having 50 different approaches to the problem instead of one national one didn't help either. Allowing states like Florida be superspreaders because they refused to do literally the bare minimum was a mistake.