139

The House GOP’s election of Rep. Mike Johnson (La.) as Speaker is likely to give an opening to social conservatives, who plan to press him on bringing anti-abortion and anti-transgender polic…

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago

“I am a Bible-believing Christian,” Johnson said in a Thursday interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News. “Go pick up a Bible off your shelf and read it, that’s my worldview. That’s what I believe in.”

The most dangerous type of conservative

[-] ares35@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

if he actually read the text, he'd have a different 'worldview'.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 18 points 1 year ago

No he wouldn't. He doesn't have the capacity to understand it beyond what his pastor's interpretation is, as evidenced by the statement "the Bible is my worldview." I read it when I was a fundie like him, and it didn't change my worldview, because I knew all the Correct™ ways to "reconcile" the problems.

I thankfully got out by other means, but not everyone escapes the "correct interpretation" indoctrination.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 60 points 1 year ago

we really dont give fox news enough credit with the destruction of society. its slow, methodical spoiling of its viewers brains. the repeated drum beat of god.country.guns.god.country.guns

it is what leads to paths that allow terrible human beings like this one to gain power.

[-] KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space 9 points 1 year ago

But no actual love for God and country.

No love for the sick, the poor, the hungry, the tired, the beaten, the abused, the isolated, the desperate, or the dying.

Just the illusion of concern so we don't have to do the work or better ourselves in any way.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Silly, you show your love of God and country through guns! And by marginalizing everyone not exactly like you.

[-] Mateoto@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

Religion was and still is the danger for society and end of democracy. It has no place in a scientific and enlightend society. Even the founding fathers knew.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Of all the nominees I think this guy has the most punchable of faces.

[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 12 points 1 year ago

Far out. This is not what we need right now.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Pointless article. None of that bullshit is passing the Senate.

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

And a few years ago, no one would have thought Roe would be overturned.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because it was political suicide & the #GOP has paid for it at the voting booth in nearly every election that has been held since then.

Like the Tories, we are currently watching the GOP break as much as they can on their way out.

[-] StephniBefni@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I really, really hope you are right.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Completely different thing. Conservatives have been biding their time for decades until the Supreme Court was favorable enough to overturn it. Whereas currently the Republicans do not have a filibuster-proof majority (or any majority) in the Senate.

Yes, at some point in the future conservatives will have a Senate majority again, but by that point the House of Representatives will have had a turnover and the discussions now are moot depending on who the next speaker is.

What we can say about overturning Roe is that it shows the dangers in relying on Supreme Court rulings in lieu of legislation. The Democrats have had multiple opportunities to pass legislation on abortion ever since Roe vs. Wade and never bothered to, and this is the result. And it will happen again with Obergefell v. Hodges unless they get off their asses and actually codify same sex marriage into law.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Pepperidge Farm remembers when these gaslighting assholes were all claiming that they had no plans to ban abortion nationwide even after Dobbs: they were just batting their eyes and talking about "states rights" and "judicial activism" and "there is no right to privacy" and "this needs to be decided at the local level" and other such horseshit.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The fact that someone with such traditional Republican principles was elected to the top post in House leadership shows that those priorities are important to the party, even if some fear the electoral consequences.

Terry Schilling, president of the American Principles Project, a super PAC that’s funded state-level anti-abortion and anti-transgender campaigns, agreed: “For the longest time social conservatives didn’t have a seat at the table.

But he’s earned an “A+” rating from the powerful anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony (SBA) Pro-Life America and has co-sponsored and advocated for legislation that would put federal limits on abortion.

A key part of the Speaker’s job is to protect and grow the number of seats held by the majority, so forcing Biden-district Republicans to vote on anti-abortion measures may be problematic.

For example, a bill to permanently codify and expand the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits certain federal funds from being used on abortion procedures, was included in a list of 12 pieces of legislation House Republicans planned to pass in the first weeks of their new majority.

Severino, who ran the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights during the Trump administration, said that bill is “low hanging fruit” for Johnson to support.


The original article contains 1,092 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 81%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Heil ~~Hitler~~ Mike Johnson. Fucking dipshit.

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
139 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4044 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS