1351
submitted 1 year ago by negativenull@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 40 points 1 year ago

Off Lemmy I've already been assured by several dickhead accelerationists that this is actually bad, because it's against the rules to successfully progress a liberal democracy when the One Right Way to effect change is revolution only. They'd rather people suffer more if it meant an end to capitalism, revolting "ends justify the means" mentality.

[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 29 points 1 year ago

Those people have such a lust for violence and don't care that the poor people they claim to be fighting for will be the ones who suffer most

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

"Why won't you die so I can avenge you‽"

[-] msage@programming.dev -4 points 1 year ago

But when I think about it, those poor people are absolutely fucked right now. By achieving small victories like these they get nothing. We have luxurious lifestyles, while the poorest don't even eat.

Fuck capitalism. House and feed everyone first, then play pretend with numbers.

[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fuck capitalism, I agree. But I don't see where a county with any other economic system was ever chomping at the bit to sacrifice to feed the poorest in the world either.

Be angry, but realistic. Don't fetishize revolutions. Revolutions generally kill quite a lot of people, the vast majority of whom are not members of the ruling class

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Ok, so can we agree to do those things without killing anyone who disagrees and then spending a few decades "protecting the revolution" with a "dictatorship of the whatever?"

Subjugating people is a terrible way to liberate them. Full stop. If you want socialism, then the only viable and sustainable path is convincing people to vote for socialism. Which is why tankie extremists are socialism's worst enemy.

[-] msage@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

Who said anything about force?

We can just spend resources to build sustainable habitats and farms for everyone.

Where is the subjugation?

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Idk seems like referendums work so we don't need all that other stuff.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Yes… let the incrementalism flow through you.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

They're certainly not bulletproof. It's obviously been a hot sec at this point, but Proposition 8 in California of all places codified marriage as exclusively being between a man and a woman when it was legalized by the California Supreme Court.

Continuing in California, Proposition 13, which froze property taxes so long as ownership is maintained but allows that frozen rate to be transferred to family, has essentially created a situation where the state is subsidizing homeowners that are already substantially wealthier than the average person while also legally enshrining a class of people who pay much less tax by virtue of inheritable status. The perverse economic effects are rather obvious.

Referendums can be great, but voters are also generally going to be inherently selfish. Local control of zoning and housing policy, just to shit on California one more time, has resulted in a massive housing crisis. There are situations where it's really important for lawmakers to choose the path that inconveniences everyone a little bit but solves a problem over the path where no individual is directly inconvenienced while the root problem only gets much worse. In Game Theory terms, referendums are very bad at handling prisoner's dilemma style situations, since voters will generally pursue their own immediate interests.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

It's because these people don't actually care about socialism or equality. You can tell, because they don't ever talk about those things. It's all's fantasizing about murdering their neighbors and enslaving workers under their system of autocracy in the name of their socialist God.

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So you want to usher in a socialist/communist society in the pursuit of freedom, egalitarianism, human progress, and the elimination of pointless suffering?

"Nah, I just want power to hurt people I don't like, and the USSR had cool aesthetics." -- tankies.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

"Off lemmy"

How about trying off the Internet entirely.

You're in a bubble, most people in the US couldn't correctly define capitalism, let alone have such a strong agenda or opinion about it.

[-] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

"off the internet"

How about trying off reality entirely.

You're in a bubble, most people in the astral plane couldn't correctly define the internet, let alone have such a strong agenda or opinion about it.

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
1351 points (98.8% liked)

News

23293 readers
5038 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS