201
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mihies@kbin.social -2 points 11 months ago

Could be, but I bet that hydrogen tanks is much cheaper, easier to produce and recycle. Also doesn't require rare earth materials.

[-] jose1324@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

They're not comparable at all, I just said it as a reaction. The battery is more comparable to how often an engine completely dies. It doesn't, really. Especially the newer ones with proper thermal management.

The tank is cheaper, sure. But the hydrogen itself and infrastructure isn't, and hydrogen isn't even really green 95% of the time. But that's a whole different topic.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

How is solar hydrogen collection stations that pull hydrogen out of the atmosphere not green?

[-] ours@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

It's wasting solar that could be used for better things.

[-] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago
[-] ours@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

But without the loss of solar to hydrogen convertion.

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
201 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

59066 readers
4390 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS