585
submitted 10 months ago by DannyMac@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yet people still defend the system that enables these greedy fucks, as if greedy fucks don't exist and corporations will toootally work in a logical manner...

Peoples' hubris toward the evils of their neighbors will be the death of humanity. Someone who fires a bunch of people to save money isn't a "boss making hard decisions" They're an asshole throwing people away to protect profit.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 0 points 10 months ago

Yet people still defend the system that enables these greedy fucks

Greed is an innate part of the human condition. There is NO system that can be created and managed by Humans that will not eventually fall victim too, and likely fall because of, greed.

Greed is built into people and will eventually topple all systems of economics or government, NONE of them are immune.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Just because greed exists does not mean it needs to be systemically enabled.

In fact, it means the exact opposite: It is a problem that we'll always have to deal with and cannot ignore.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Just because greed exists does not mean it needs to be systemically enabled.

In any system maintained by humans greed will eventually become systemically enabled. Capitalism, Communism, Socialism, Monarchy...it doesn't matter.

When there is power and money to be had the people who love those things will ceaselessly flock to it and no Government in the history of humanity has ever managed to stop those people from eventually taking over.

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

You’re both right.

Greed and psychopathy will float to the top of every system, because the greediest and most psychopathic will inevitably see the system as a game to be won.

Ideally we shun it, but the “useful psychopath” is helpful to our own greed.

If only we could prevent it, but I don’t have that answer.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 2 points 10 months ago

If only we could prevent it, but I don’t have that answer.

There is no answer. You could literally create a policing body whose sole function was to find the greedy and psychopathic and remove them from society and that body would quickly become home to the very people its charged with removing. It takes so very few people to start the inevitable decline and its impossible to perfectly screen them out forever.

[-] jandar_fett@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Doesn't mean we shouldn't try. This is a very defeatist attitude you seem to have. I get it, btw.

[-] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

Preventive maintenance is a thing. As long as we keep wanting to work towards a better system we will move towards a better system. You say it will eventually fall. How far is eventually? I bet we could push it out til at least the heat death of the universe if we tried doing something other than robbing one-another.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Preventive maintenance is a thing.

That would work if the majority of people stayed interested...forever. This has literally never happened in recorded history.

How far is eventually?

It varies, longest in History was 1,500 years (Roman Empire) but as information accelerates so to does greed. The US is looking like it may be done around the 250 year mark but a lot of that was when information and society moved much slower. Younger Techno-Nations are declining at nearly the same rate and are unlikely to make even make that much.

I bet we could push it out til at least the heat death of the universe if we tried doing something other than robbing one-another.

That's the rub. There has always been and will always be enough people robbing each other to break a system, any system. Its only a matter of time and I seriously think the amount of time it takes has a lot do with the pace of society and speed of information.

[-] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

People have been interested in civilization since the dawn of civilization, dude. Even when it collapses it regrows. We're naturally social creatures and ideas don't die. Even in times of decline people aspire to do better.

Medieval European peasants knew what Roman aqueducts were for. They knew that civilization had fallen, but they made a new one and eventually it regrew to the point of the previous Roman empire, and then beyond, through ups and downs, until now.

Not everyone remains interested the whole time, but it does carry forward.

[-] jandar_fett@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah. That's how culture works from an anthropological lens. Culture makes people and people make culture and each individual moves the needle just a microscopic amount while some move it a bit more. (Gross simplification) my wife has a master's in classical anthropo and I had some exposure to anthropological theory lol.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I mean, the problem is that people who suck at satisfying their greed fight tooth and nail to protect the greed of others.

It doesn't make sense for most people to support a system where most people are losers, but here we are.

[-] jandar_fett@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It makes sense if the false idea that "you can be like the greedy ones in power if you work to prop them up"

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
585 points (98.7% liked)

News

22838 readers
3955 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS