529
curious
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
529 points (80.9% liked)
Political Memes
5376 readers
3178 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
what pisses me off is someone pawning this off on clinton. This bill passed with veto proofed majority so of course he signed it. No president vetoes a bill when that is the case because it makes them look bad and just wastes everyone's time. Granted that was back when the republicans still compromise some so no one was looking to iritate people they had to work with for no reason.
no he should not have. again it was a time were some compromises could come about and not the cluster of dysfunction we had today. don't get me wrong it was well on its way but there was at least at that time some hope for it. It did not get totally buried until obama.
Yes, he absolutely should have, and maybe someone would have figured out why the the fascists wanted that law. Instead Democrats INCLUDING CLINTON said "gee, conservatism really does need some extra free speech rights!.." Yes, that was their reasoning: defend "free speech" in the "marketplace of ideas" while making sure that any opposing voices would be eliminated. It was as fucking stupid then as it is now.
Your dragging all sorts of things into it (other members of congress). It was a veto proof majority and acting like dick republicans of today would not have helped 30 plus years ago. You seem to have no concept of that time period at all.
the democrats follow the law and don't try to cheat like the republicans. put the blame on the criminal and not the person who failed to protect the victim ehough. this is just so rediculous.
O really? Who devised the rule systems that McConnell used to usurp the Senate?
this goes back to the democrats not being as bad as the repbulicans. They just have not manipulated the rules in their favor the way the republicans have and retain historical norms longer. Yeah they eventually change do to repbulican dickish behavior but they would not be a better party by beating them to the punch on that.