this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
23 points (100.0% liked)

Movies & TV

23398 readers
37 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's fucking goooooo

lets-fucking-go

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I didn't think they'd actually go through with this, since IIRC Fury Road wasn't that profitable despite universal acclaim.

spoilerAlso Fury Road was bad so I'd hoped cooler heads would prevail, rip

[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Fury Road wasn't that profitable despite universal acclaim.

Budget $154.6–185.1 million

Box office $380 million

Sure it wasn't raking in several times its budget, but that's not terrible. There are movies that don't even make back their budget.

Also Fury Road was bad

imagine not calling it "mediocre!!!" bakunin-immortan

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Here's Wiki's citation about Fury Road having lost $20-$40 million, probably due to marketing costs and such. It's not a huge bomb by any stretch, but to lose money after all that box office take... so it needed to take 3-4× its budget to break even. lol

Idk if that's a joke or something, I just didn't think it was very good. Amazing how it's just the tanker bit from Road Warrior stretched out into two hours or whatever, but more boring?

[–] marx_mentat@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It's one of my top 5 action movies of all time. They just don't make movies like that anymore period, and judging by the trailer of this one, even it's sequel gave up on doing stunt work.

If you're saying real action isn't profitable and shouldn't happen anymore, then that just sucks sadness

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, no I was actually surprised when I learned it lost money. It was a huge hit, so I was like, how did it LOSE MONEY? Hollywood moment I guess...

Theoretically I should like it, I love Mad Max and The Road Warrior. I found it kind of clean and shiny looking (and also waaaaay too orange) though, in spite of all the hubbub about the practical effects. I love stunt work and practical stuff, but Idk here... the 3D 'moments' in Fury Road are pure cringe imo :)

It would be rad if they did more than one cool action movie with big cars. Fury Road should not spell any sort of death for the genre.

[–] marx_mentat@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The only cringe 3d moment I can think of is the clearly all cgi guitar blasting out of the screen near the end of the movie and I agree with you those kind of shots are definitely cringe.

I agree they should make more movies like fury road but I can't help but think that the studio screwing them over a ton of money and blaming them for production delays caused by the kind of real world production work they were doing is a small glimpse into why no one makes movies like that anymore. Too much risk and no reward other than appreciation from a handful of movie dorks who prefer watching real stuff over fake CGI action.

[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

Idk if that's a joke or something

it's a reference to this