167

"This is awesome. We're killing Russians and not even sacrificing any real people (americans)."

"It's better than that. It's actually a huge MIC grift."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 72 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes, he responded to it.

He claimed that he was smuggling women from Eastern Europe on temporary work visas without any guarantee of work despite charging exorbitant amounts, withholding their passports and pay, stuffing up to 20 of them into a single condo, and underpaying them for their labour but it was actually a humanitarian act because he was smuggling Jews from an undisclosed central European country because they were being persecuted.

He wants people to believe that he did it for humanitarian reasons and that he has reformed.

I often call out Beau's followers and they always say the same things:

  • He served his time

  • He has changed his ways/I believe in allowing people the opportunity to reform

  • His work is reparations for the crimes he committed in the past

He served his time

Nope.

He had a sweetheart deal with a judge and the conditions under he achieved this deal have been sealed. He served months of a sentence that is customarily decades.

He didn't serve his time.

He has changed his ways/I believe in allowing people the opportunity to reform

Has he even admitted to the crimes he actually committed? How can he reform if he actively lies about it and pretends that his actions were altruistic, humanitarian actions?

Do you believe that the US prison system dispenses justice and rehabilitation or are you a prison abolitionist? Because you can't be both.

How much of his now-sizeable income does he devote to victims of human trafficking? How much of his activism does he dedicate towards the prevention of human trafficking and supporting the victims of it?

What restorative justice has he sought out for the victims of his crimes?

His work is reparations for the crimes he committed in the past

By amassing a large social media following and getting them sweet Patreon bucks?

By, uh, doing some shit-tier journalism with a veneer of leftism?

How have his victims gotten restorative justice from him becoming a YouTube personality exactly?

 

Of course, they never manage to respond. Shocking, right?

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 39 points 10 months ago

Why can't a single person on these entertainment sites like YouTube ever turn out to be actually decent people?

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 44 points 10 months ago

I think it's the algorithm. Lots of small creators are lovely, but the sort of people who get really big care more about fame, attention and power than they do about actually creating things for people to enjoy/learn from.

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 27 points 10 months ago

maybe that sweetheart deal was agreeing to work for the feds

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

This is exactly what my hunch is. I don't trust the guy one bit.

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

It absolutely was, anyone who still thinks it was just some coincidence that he became an "activist" mere months after being given a get out of jail free pass for fucking human trafficking is a baby

[-] Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net 26 points 10 months ago

Someone should really make a bot where this gets posted every time his creeper ass is brought up

[-] voight@hexbear.net 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I agree. He's an excellent example to show people this really happens.

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2021-03-30/google-moonshot-redirect-far-right-online-extremism-anarchist

And how many of our grifters have gotten half as obvious a pat on the back as this from the feds? Maybe Robert Evans / iwriteok ???

[-] KarlBarqs@hexbear.net 19 points 10 months ago

He has changed his ways/I believe in allowing people the opportunity to reform

I also believe in allowing people the opportunity to reform, but that's usually involving things like drug crimes, or thefts, or other similar crimes fueled by socioeconomic factors

When someone goes and establishes a fairly complex human trafficking network though, it's a little different

[-] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I mean, I do believe that even someone convicted of human trafficking is capable of genuine rehabilitation and reintegrating into society but if he's not out there putting in hard work both into himself personally and in victim support/human trafficking prevention then I'm not willing to entertain the notion that he has reformed.

He essentially robbed dozens upon dozens of women of their rights, their money, and part of their lives by throwing them into deplorable conditions. I have absolutely nothing to back this up with but my suspicion is that a non-insignificant percentage of the Eastern European women who were working in hotels for a pittance would have turned to sex work to supplement their income. It's hard to imagine that it wouldn't have been an explicit part of the operation, whether by design or by dovetailing the semi-above board side with a more shady parallel operation.

(It's not like the victims would have been eager to come forward about it if they were forced or coerced into sex work. But if you take young women to a foreign country and put them into conditions that are borderline destitution while they work for less than scrupulous hotels and... I mean, the likely outcome is going to be that a large number of them end up in sex work and nobody is going to convince me otherwise - I'm not that naive.)

From what I can tell he was sorta like a middle-man in the whole operation but if you steal years from dozens of people's lives while you directly profit from it then you need to be paying back that debt to society for the rest of your life as far as I'm concerned. At least, if you want to stake a claim to having reformed anyway.

this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
167 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15898 readers
518 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS