Nuclear power is clearly and by far the best answer we have to reduce fossil fuel emissions rapidly and provide electricity to more people than ever. (hexbear.net)

submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by fed@hexbear.net to c/politics@hexbear.net

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

this is a subject that the USA gov and China even agree on. It is such a shame westerners have such a negative reaction to nuclear energy. but it isn't as profitable as fossil fuels/selling new electric cars so :meow-shining:

https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/advantages-and-challenges-nuclear-energy

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202106/1227103.shtml

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Nagarjuna@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago

You're acting like anti nuclear lefties aren't also anti pollution generally

[-] AlexandairBabeuf@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago

solar panels or wind turbines aren't environmentally free either, those costs are just more readily externalised than spicy rocks

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2021

0 points (NaN% liked)

politics

22258 readers

194 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

FidelCastro@hexbear.net

invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net

Alaskaball@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

blashork@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

VILenin@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net