104

CNN reporting on some interesting survey results from the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research in Ramallah. Seven hundred and fifty adults were interviewed face to face in the West Bank, and 481 were interviewed in Gaza, also in person. The Gaza data collection was done during the recent truce, when it was safer for researchers to move about.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

"we're outsized in military strength so we should pursue war over diplomacy" what?

[-] Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Israel is never going to respond to Diplomacy. That's not how genocidal states operate.

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

What does that have to do with the clarification I inquired about?

[-] Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

You're acting as if Diplomacy is an option. It's not. Genocidal states do not respond to Diplomacy. They only respond to bloodshed and slaughter. Did the Nazis come to the table in good faith while they were genociding? No? Then why do you think Israel is any different?

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

That's twice you didn't actually respond to my comment. Now you're going down a rabbit hole extrapolating what my beliefs are. Do you do this offline? Walk down the street and shout at strangers about tangential topics to things you seem them observing or working on? Ffs I dont even feel that differently than you.

[-] Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

I definitely responded to what you meant originally, even if you think it doesn't make sense as a reply. Why are they pursuing war when they're outmatched? Because it's literally the only option when dealing with genocidal states. What other clarification could you need? Apologies if I gave you too much credit towards having opinions that make sense though.

[-] Davin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

How long do you think they should try diplomacy for before they realize that it's not working?

[-] triclops6@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

How long do you think they have tried it?

[-] Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

30 years or so.

[-] Davin@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

The person I'm replying to seems to be missing a lot of historical context, which is why I'm asking the question and why I'm not going to answer yours without a bit of quid pro quo.

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago
[-] Davin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I'm trying to interpret this as a response to my post, but it doesn't make sense. I don't want to assume incorrectly or misinterpret your response so I need you to clarify what you mean.

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Hey, I'm sorry. I think the thread loaded buggy for me. I thought your reply was directly to me about my comment

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

What? My comment is that the above doesn't make logical sense. What are you talking about?

[-] Davin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The cowardly and terrorist attack on civilians Hamas committed on Oct 7th was short sighted and doesn't make logical sense. Fighting back against a superior force when all other options have been exhausted does make sense. There are a few historical examples of a small force overcoming a superior force, it could happen. Not likely, but again, when there aren't other options, trying the same thing that didn't work over and over again for 50 years isn't very logical either.

this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
104 points (90.6% liked)

News

23276 readers
2960 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS