970
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] slifer@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@currychaos

For a minute I was scratching my head wondering how I missed all the Magic the Gathering coverage when I barely saw any 🤣

[-] Octavio@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of the time I spent in 2020 wondering why all the right wingers were so mad at the Bureau of Land Management.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

it's like the british empire is sundowning or something

[-] galloog1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The western land issue is one of the chief things that makes them popular out west. There's more federal land than private and state combined.

[-] JudgeHolden@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Their sense of entitlement when it comes to public lands is unreal.

[-] galloog1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If someone else owns more of your state than your own citizens, do you really have a state? It's easy for us to pontificate in states where there's hardly any federal land and the issue is reversed. There needs to be more federal land in the East where ecosystems mean more and less in the West.

[-] IonAddis@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It sure would be nice if any MTG mention is promptly spammed by Magic the Gathering content and buried. I don't even play MTG and I'd prefer to have my feed taken over by it! Fuck yeah, nerds--get your game on!

(Disclosure: I am indeed a nerd, too.)

[-] PloKoon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

How do you do, fellow nerd?

[-] Taokan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

20 years ago, I might have agreed (even if naively). Today, MTG has just turned into a cashgrab. The original game bought and bought again through acquisitions, and rare/mythic rare cards becoming the staple for competitive play driving constructed deck costs into the hundreds (sometimes thousands) of dollars. Between this and the attempted reversal of their sibling D&D's licensing structure (particularly for content creators), I just have no more interest in participating in collecting or playing MTG. I'm nostalgic for the days we used to have big multiway matches (even predating EDH/commander) in between rounds of chess tournaments, or at the school lunch tables, but those days are never coming back. Everything about their design structure now is about extracting maximum profit from their playerbase. Arena offers one of the best CCG game clients one could ask for, but again, the design takes all the P2W gimmicks perfected over the last 2 decades: the gacha, the battle pass, the daily rewards the demand you return to play imbalanced matches again and again and again, essentially becoming the content, the dopamine hit for someone else that paid to win.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

They did find the One Ring card from their new LOTR set recently. Some shop is paying $2 million euros for it. I desperately hope someone throws it into a volcano a la Mount Doom.

[-] a_large_rock@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

After all, why shouldn't I keep it?

[-] currychaos@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

It's ok. When MTG news first started popping up on Reddit, I was wondering why everyone hated Magic the Gathering

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
970 points (97.7% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4403 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS