this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
896 points (99.8% liked)

196

17000 readers
1379 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] starship_lizard@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago (7 children)
[–] chalkman@sh.itjust.works 85 points 2 years ago (106 children)

Hard-core authoritarian communist. The kinda peeps who support Stalin and shit

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 34 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Isn't "authoritarian communist" kind of an oxymoron? 😂 like the whole point of communism is that there isn't a ruling class. I guess Russia and China were never really communist, just statist authoritarian right? I mean, the Nazis called themselves Socialist. They were nowhere near that

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 31 points 2 years ago

Isn’t “authoritarian communist” kind of an oxymoron?

Yes. Yes, it is. I sometimes call them “pseudocommunists” for this reason.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Isn't "authoritarian communist" kind of an oxymoron?

Most real life implementations of communism used an authoritarian one party system. You can say these aren't true examples of communism, but that just ends up sounding like cope unfortunately.

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy@beehaw.org 25 points 2 years ago

None of those states ever gave economic or political power to the working classes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blackbelt352 18 points 2 years ago

As how Marx outlined Communism as the evolution of Capitalism once it reaches a scale of production that everyone can have their needs met, resulting in a classless, stateless, moneyless society, then yes authoritarian communist is an oxymoron.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (105 replies)
[–] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 75 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (29 children)

When the Soviets invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968, there were some british leftists who cheered for those tanks driving into Prague. They proved by this that they didn't care about leftism, socialism, democracy or anti-imperialism at all - they approved the imperialism and militarism of the Soviet regime.

Their praise for the rolling tanks is what gave them their name: Tankies.

So, people who love North Korea, or defend russia invading Ukraine, people, who stand by even the most autoritarian, anti-democratic, militaristic, imperialistic regimes - just because they call themselves "socialist" or "communist" - are "Tankies".

[–] Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] CrimsonOnoscopy@beehaw.org 33 points 2 years ago (4 children)

And Stalinist, Maoists, and other authoritarian Communists.

Usually they also "love" countries like North Korea, China, and for whatever reason (aNtI iMpErIaLiSm), Syria, Russia, and so on.

Red Fascists. They use the same tactics of gas lighting and goal post shifting.

[–] GuyDudeman@possumpat.io 13 points 2 years ago

And engaging in bad faith but accusing everyone else of engaging in bad faith.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] lauchmelder@einweckglas.com 45 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] limbo99@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's the prog-lib equivalent of woke. It's used dismiss leftists with out engaging with our arguments. The term has lite ideological or argumentative use.

[–] Darorad@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Libs use it that way, actual leftists use it to describe fascists that think they're on the left and like red flags.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)