1123

Reddit CEO: We're Sticking With API Changes, Despite Subreddits Going Dark (uk.pcmag.com)

submitted 1 year ago by 0485919158191@lemmy.world to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world

529 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] GamerGrant@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

Idk I use relay and he thinks he can do it for 3 dollars a month, but that's still giving into reddit. I'd rather then switch and start making Lemmy apps, or adapt their app over, might be unreasonable but just a thought

[-] Risk@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

3 dollars a month for a lesser experience, mind. What with reddit stopping access to NSFW/explicit stuff via non-official apps.

But honestly, even if my app of choice - Sync - could do it, I'm not about to pay a corporation for content generated for free by us. The whole thing stinks of the slow slide of social media into the gutter. Happened with Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Reddit is no different.

Federated social media might take a little while to take off, but it will be so much less toxic and much more enjoyable without the ever expanding need of a corporation to deliver more and more profit at the expense of the user.

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

I’m not about to pay a corporation for content generated for free by us

That's actually a good point. I don't mind paying for access to an app, since it costs money to maintain, but our posts draw people into the site to read advice, news, and funny stuff. If Reddit is going full-monetization, there should at least be some payment for... upvotes? Views?

[-] viimeinen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not really a good point. Servers, bandwidth and employees cost money. Even if content is generated for free, those things cost money. A reasonable price is totally fair for an ad-free experience.

[-] yankeebobo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This. For those that understand that standing up the infrastructure costs money, I don’t think paying a reasonable price would be out of the realm. Even the Apollo dev was stating that API should not be free, but reasonable.

[-] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I feel like there's a weird disconnect in the way that a lot of people perceive physical and digital infrastructure.

For something like a road, it's natural to assume that maintaining it costs money - after all, you can see the wear and tear on it, you can see the guys patching it, etc. Because of this, things like paying tolls are an annoyance, but most everybody accepts it as the cost of keeping things running.

For a website, though, almost everything is hidden from the end user. You don't know how the server is doing beyond "is it up or down," you don't know how big the dev team was or how many people maintain it, or what costs they incur... And so, people seem to be more prone to assuming that "it just works," without considering the costs behind it.

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Right, but the content is also what draws people in. Not just the infrastructure. So if some of that money made its way back to mods and top posters then they would be feeding the community instead of charging them for the content that brings in more viewers.