460
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

She acknowledged that she must do better in the South Carolina primary than in New Hampshire to continue her campaign.

Former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley blasted the Republican National Committee on Sunday, saying it was not an honest broker in the party’s 2024 primary race.

In an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Haley, the last remaining major GOP opponent to former President Donald Trump, said the RNC was “clearly not” playing fairly.

“Do you think the RNC has been an honest broker in this case?” moderator Kristen Welker asked.

Haley replied, “I mean, clearly not.”

“If you’re gonna go in and basically tell the American people that you’re gonna go and decide who the nominee is after only two states have voted? I mean, 48 states out there?” she said. “This is a democracy. The American people want to have their say in who is going to be their nominee. We need to give them that.”

Haley noted that it takes 1,215 delegates to reach the nomination, the majority of which have yet to be allocated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 110 points 9 months ago

Aww gee didn't hear her complaining when it didn't effect her, she's been kissing Trump's ass this entire time.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 63 points 9 months ago

That's changed in the last few weeks. Now she's attacking him. It probably took her way too long for it to matter though.

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

Too little, too late.

She's been a Trump bootlicker for the last few years, so changing your mind about him this late in the game when it affects you is damn near meaningless, she's shown who she is, a weak willed traitor sympathizer with no true moral center, the party of law & order my ass.

The only Republican on the debate stage during the primaries that isn't a traitor sympathizer was clearly Chris Christie, who still sucks, he's just not a traitor like his cohorts who lick Trump's taint

[-] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

He wasn't a traitor during the primaries, but he was plenty traitorous from 2016-2020.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

He was if you consider being a Russian asset running for president traitorous..

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago

The only Republican on the debate stage during the primaries that isn’t a traitor sympathizer was clearly Chris Christie, who still sucks

I've seen at least two interviews in the past yearish (when his candidacy was only rumored) where he was asked (after acknowledging how awful Trump was) if he'd vote for him again. He wouldn't answer.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

She needed to be attacking his ass for the past 16 months. It’s too little too late now.

That said, when you look at what’s happening in Nevada, where they’re just making up new primary and caucus rules to make her votes not count at all, this is what a rigged election actually looks like.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 months ago

This is bizarre really. Polling shows it's not even competitive. There's an outside chance Haley might win maybe two states at most, and that's unlikely.

Trump would win the primary legit, but they're rigging things anyway. That's some top tier crookery.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

They want to declare Trump the winner so he can formally start to tap into the RNC war chest.

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

That, and they want to get on Donnie's Good list and not his Naughty list

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Really the cutoff should be Jan. 7 2021. If they weren't calling him out by then (or stopped at any point since then), they're only doing it when it's self-serving and convenient.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago

It's the Republican way "Unless the problem directly effects me, it doesn't exist."

this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
460 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19145 readers
4637 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS