260
submitted 8 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They were going nuclear on it for one reason.

it drove into the crowd and didn't recognize the crowd as People.

It was actively trying to drive through them.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Where is that quote from? I didnt see it in the article

[-] ArtieShaw@kbin.social 30 points 8 months ago

This happened during street festivities for lunar new year, so a lot of people are connecting the dots. They don't mention that the car was aggressively trying to drive through a crowd, but it seems like it was trying to make its way through a crowd.

https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/why-did-a-san-francisco-crowd-light-waymos-driverless-vehicle-on-fire/

Multiple witnesses said Waymo’s navigation technology became confused by festivities and fireworks that were lit to celebrate the Lunar New Year. Witness Anirudh Koul said the driverless car “got stuck immediately in front.”

Another witness said the car’s presence in the middle of Chinatown’s celebrations triggered frustrations in the crowd. “You could feel the frustration when people were just trying to celebrate,” she told KRON4.

load more comments (46 replies)
[-] quirzle@kbin.social 17 points 8 months ago

Seems like the witnesses saw it differently.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/02/12/waymo-set-on-fire-sf/72567647007/

"They were putting out some rage for really no reason at all. They just wanted to vandalize something, and they did," witness Edwin Carungay told KGO-TV.

The witness told the outlet the Waymo was vandalized and set on fire by a big group of people.

"One young man jumped on the hood, and on the windshield.," Carungay told KGO. "That kind of started the whole melee."

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

From the original social media video.

Ask yourself, this is a Chinese new year celebration, a street party. Why is there a driverless car in the middle of a street party?

All the media reports start with a driverless car in the middle of a street party, surrounded by really angry people. Why was the car there? Why are they angry at it?

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago

Nope. Try again.

[-] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago

That sounds like BS you are making up, any source?

No article has mentioned that, the story so far has been that it was minding its own business when someone jumped on the hood.

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

To be honest it was a link on Kbin that had raw video of the entire thing.

But just stop and think:

  1. It's in a crowd of people.
  2. If it was just a bunch of thugs and looters they'd have started with the nearby shops, not the car.
  3. After the car was hit, the shops weren't looted, so they weren't random thugs.

The car fucked up and the oligarchs are protecting it.

[-] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago

So you're making it up

this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
260 points (96.4% liked)

News

23293 readers
5038 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS