858
rule (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 10 months ago by lars to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

according to @Custoslibera’s post

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

No, liberalism means liberal, even outside America.

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 1 points 10 months ago

It doesn't

There is really no need to be this stubborn. Look it up yourself.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

It does. The term liberal comes from liberalism, which was founded during the Enlightenment. It isn't an "American" thing to tie liberalism to liberals, it's the definition.

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's the definition when you're talking about liberalism for sure. But that's not what I'm referring to. The other definition is the one which, in context, I am obviously referring to.

one who is open-minded or not strict in the observance of orthodox, traditional, or established forms or ways

With the previous definition, it is clear I am talking about leftists. Context is king.

But, lesson learned; don't use the phrase liberal outside of a philosophical/academic context.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Leftism isn't a vague, general synonym for "goodness," nor does it entitled you to use terminology for a right-wing ideology as a synonym for leftism. Even in a philosophical and academic concept, you'd get a bunch of confused looks.

  1. Capitalists can be open-minded and go against tradition without being left-wing.

  2. Left vs. Right isn't about open-mindedness or a sense of futurism, it's about collective vs. individual ownership of the Means of Production.

  3. Using an Enlightenment term for a Capitalist ideology as a term to describe leftists is wrong.

That's why everyone has been pointing out that you've been using terms incorrectly. You can either accept that you misspoke, and everyone can move on, or we will be stuck here.

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 2 points 10 months ago

Honestly, let's be stuck here. I'm tired of repeating myself. There's nothing to be gained here, you understand what I was trying to say, even if you think my words were wrong, and that's good enough for me.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not heated, I appreciate that you've helped me to understand that I can't say liberal on the internet because people will misunderstand my intention.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

It's more that you shouldn't use right wing terms to refer to left wing ideas, it's generally bad practice to pretend people believe in the opposite of reality.

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

To be clear, when I did a few university classes on philosophy, the term liberal was used to mean how I was using it. It was not once used to mean anything other than that (except during the first time the concept was introduced to us, when the lecturer said the Australian Liberal Party isn't liberal).

So for me, liberal is not a right wing term, it is inherently leftist.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

It cannot be.

Leftism is not synonymous with forward thinking, nor synonymous with being open minded. Leftism is about worker ownership of the Means of Production.

Liberal, again, is focused on the Enlightenment philosophy Liberalism, which is characterized by espousing individual liberty and private property rights. It focuses on things like being open-minded and forward-thinking, like you've said, but you're misattributing that to leftism.

You've also been incorrectly saying Americans miscategorize the term into a right-wing term. It's the opposite, conservative fascists see liberals, who are still right-wingers, as leftists, due to the Overton Window. Liberals are still right-wing, and still espouse support for Capitalism.

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yep, my bad. Yes, left-right is about means of production and economical sharing. Though, I would argue, leftism is inherently progressive, because communism naturally succeeds capitalism.

I suppose one day leftism and progressivism will part ways, but it's unlikely to occur in our lifetime.

So for now, I hope my intent was inferred, when my words were wrong.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Now, you're starting to make more sense!

I would definitely agree that Leftism is usually more progressive than Rightism! It certainly is, in countries like America, where the genuine leftists are also very advanced when it comes to social issues. However, because leftism is not defined by being open-minded, correct, or even forward-thinking, and merely tends to align with those far more often than not, it can be confusing to completely combine the terminology when they ought not to.

It's like using "red" as a synonym for fascism, when red is also the color of Anarcho-Communism, just because the Nazis used red on their flag. It's better to use the proper terms.

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 2 points 10 months ago

That's why I wear a Swastika whenever I go out in public, so people know that I want to spread prosperity and good luck!

Thanks for clearing that up, I'll be more careful with using leftist/progressive/liberal from now.

this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
858 points (99.8% liked)

196

16717 readers
4027 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS