664
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zerog_bandit@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I love all the comments like "Biden isn't being tough enough on Israel! Biden isn't stopping the genocide!"

Besides the fact that people are asking Biden to do something that directly hurts US foreign policy interests.....

Do they REALLY think that the Republican party is on the side of stopping brown people dying? Biden in office is probably the most gentle response Palestine is going to get for 10/7. Republicans are frothing at the mouth to boost JDAM and Paveway kit sales.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 32 points 5 months ago

If preventing a genocide is hurting "foreign policy interests", then those interests are shite.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

exactly what i was thinking.

if this is the lesser of two evils, you probably have reached evil long ago.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Yep they keep saying lesser of two evils while the options get more and more evil despite claiming "incremental progress". Moderates are completely disconnected from reality or they're just too afraid to actually push for something better.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

The problem is with Trump, particularly, there's good reason to be afraid.

"We want to punish the democrats for supporting Israel, so we are going to let Trump win"

GOP proceeds to double down on oppressive wars, no improvement for Gaza. Further, you get a government full of leaders that, in the wake of losing in 2020, openly pondered ways of just rigging the election so they don't have to get votes to win anymore. You had laws proposed in GOP states to declare the legislature could pick whatever electors they wanted ignoring their voters. You had people running for non-partisan election administration positions promising they'll make sure Republicans win, no matter what. They actively tried to send fake electors that particular cycle, even without any legal backing.

So, in at least one scenario, congratulations, you successfully admonished Biden for his misbehavior, and now, we have at least as bad misbehavior, and maybe some unwinding of democracy to make sure we never get to influence foreign policy ever again.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

The problem is with Trump, particularly, there’s good reason to be afraid.

I agree. The threat of Trump seems like a bigger risk to me than the risks introduced by stopping the supply of arms to Israel or vowing to veto any attempts to block a rail strike. But apparently moderates and Joe Biden would prefer to avoid those risks and instead gamble they can win the general election anyway. But what do I know? I'm not part of the majority voting bloc so I'm not responsible for what happens.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I’m not part of the majority voting bloc so I’m not responsible for what happens.

I mean, to the extent any voter is "responsible" for what happens, if you abstain from voting or explicitly vote for a candidate you know is going to lose to make a point, then you have some responsibility for the result, and thus it better be a result you reasonably expect to live with. If you think Trump isn't any worse than Biden, then voting for the candidate you like best, their chances be damned makes sense. If you sincerely think Trump is a risk that can't be tolerated, then when general election comes around, you unfortunately should probably vote for Biden.

I personally think Trump is too problematic to risk his victory on principle. Any other presidential contest I can recall, sure, punish the mainstream by voting third party, it's not like any of the presidential candidates were that much worse than the others. If somehow Haley became the republican frontrunner, by all means, I might not prefer her, but I don't have a dire sense of dread about her. She wouldn't be a better choice than Biden on Gaza, but at least your vote was probably clearly seen to be one he forfeited because of his stance. It's just a matter of how important it is to vote against a particular candidate as to whether you have the comfortable option of voting for your favorite versus voting against an unfavored candidate.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

I mean, to the extent any voter is “responsible” for what happens, if you abstain from voting or explicitly vote for a candidate you know is going to lose to make a point, then you have some responsibility for the result

The vote of a majority of people in the country will have no impact on the result of the election whatsoever. Most of us don't live in the sliver of electorally competitive states.

If you live in Georgia, you should be deeply pondering the very real consequences of a protest vote, but this idea that every voter is responsible is just not how our system works.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I mean, to the extent any voter is “responsible” for what happens

Sure. But the bulk of the responsibility rests on the moderates as they are the majority voting bloc.

I'll accept my grain of responsibility as someone from an, apparently irrelevant, minority wing.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] beardown@lemm.ee 20 points 5 months ago

Supporting Israel's genocide of Palestinians is directly harming the US' foreign policy interests.

[-] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

The entire point of Israel’s genocide in the end is to perpetuate war and conflict so rightwing nutjobs like Netanyahu can retain power by killing people and claiming they are keeping people safe instead of doing actual leadership work and passing effective policy to save people.

In that sense Israel’s genocide makes the entire world less safe by empowering strongman leaders like this.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

The foreign policy of most on the right is basically "Turn it all to glass." Which is terrifying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 months ago

Are you seriously incapable of viewing Biden's actions outside of a lens related to the upcoming election?

[-] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 11 points 5 months ago

It's almost as though some people are incapable of holding two thought in their head at the same time: the RNC is absolutely fascist and pro-genocide, and Biden is doing the wrong thing in this specific situation and should be criticized for it. If all criticism of a president must stop, you live in a dictatorship. This one just happens to be a two party dictatorship where one awful party is kept from criticism by the threat of the other being even worse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

How does that even make sense? GOP being worse doesn't mean that Biden is doing a great job. He's bloody well FUNDING and ARMING the genocidal IDF. That there is a worse option doesn't make Biden's actions in any way "good".

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Besides the fact that people are asking Biden to do something that directly hurts US foreign policy interests…

Why would enabling the genocide of Palestinians benefit US foreign policy?

Also, isn't our current beef with Yemen and the 96% drop off in Suez traffic a direct result of Israel's War in Gaza? Isn't keeping the Suez open to traffic pursuant to US foreign policy?

Do they REALLY think that the Republican party is on the side of stopping brown people dying?

I think that America is a Fascist Nation enabling the will of some of the most deranged and brutal regimes in human history. Between the Israelis, the Saudis, the Indian Hinduvistas, and the Duterte/Marcos cartel in the Philippians, we've got - bare minimum - four Fascist regional governments that we are falling over ourselves to help perpetuate atrocities of nightmarish proportions.

Republicans and Democrats seem to be in alignment in supporting all of these horrifying campaigns of mass slaughter. If this is the future of American politics, our government deserves to fail and I pray that our failed state is wiped from the face of the Earth.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

This is the worst case scenario for Gazans and people who know them. They don't care about Biden's infrastructure record or Trump's position on NATO.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

No, worst case scenario involves nukes.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

To you. For them they've already lost entire branches of their extended families. A figurative nuke already went off for them.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

The irony of those hicktards...

this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
664 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4285 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS