1946
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] garretble@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I still can’t believe we haven’t seen a @whitehouse.gov.social or whatever spring up. Why in the world would they not want to control their social media presence in house? Why allow Twitter that luxury?

If they went cold turkey on Twitter and set up @potus@whitehouse.social the posts would still end up on Twitter because people would cross post them (just like we see Twitter posts on Masto or lemmy).

At least some EU governments have started making their own accounts.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago

I emailed my region’s national weather service and asked that they join Mastodon and the meteorologist said they wanted to but there’s an approval process for communications and it takes awhile to add new services.

I’m basically completely off X (and haven’t had a Facebook account for years) but during a recent storm, I made a new Twitter account that just follows local government accounts. It’s annoying that the fastest way to find out about flooded roads and stuff is X and I really hope that changes soon.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

I emailed my region’s national weather service and asked that they join Mastodon

Thank you for doing that!

[-] uis@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago

Good meteorologist

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I follow a couple of not stations that have a Masto presence, but I get where you are coming from.

Hopefully the tide will shift more this year.

I know that some people are upset about Threads federating, but I feel like some people may never end up on Masto but could have a Threads account. A local weather station, for example. But if you could simply subscribe to them via Masto without ever making a Threads account that’d be great. And the weather station gets to serve more people (the “normies” — for lack of a better word — on Threads and the nerds on Masto).

[-] uis@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago
[-] garretble@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Just as an example, really.

A lot of Masto servers I’ve seen have use the .social extension. I feel like it does lend itself to letting people know what to expect when seeing a handle that ends with .social. It’s maybe an easy connection to make that that’s some sort of social media entity.

They certainly don’t have to use that type of url, but I think it’d be cool and it makes sense for what it is.

I’ve thought that news stations should do the same, too. Like an @news@cnn.social would be cool and have built in verification simply because they could lock down its users to only approved people so you’d know that @wolf@cnn.social is definitely Wolf Blitzer. No need for checkmarks.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I have no idea who Wolf Blitzer is, but for example there are social.network.europa.eu, social.bund.de and social.kernel.org. So US can use social.gov.us

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Oh yeah. Making a subdomain like that also works. And maybe is even easier for existing domains.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

And you don't even pay for subdomains

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

They really went for a double subdomain and network.europa.eu is not even a thing. Also it's insufficiently Latin. curia.europa.eu and consilium.europa.eu is proper, europarl.europa.eu already makes much less sense it should be senatus.europa.eu.

[-] neutron@thelemmy.club 4 points 5 months ago

That's how registrars start cranking up the renewal price for .social domains.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

#strongerICANN

ICANN's renewal fee is $0.18

[-] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

poontang.gov.social

[-] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

.us is sketchy AF. They should use something.gov.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

.gov domain should be either abolished or allowed for use by any governments. Of course US is sketchy AF.

[-] liv@lemmy.nz 3 points 5 months ago

That would be confusing. I want to be able to tell govt.nz apart from the US one.

[-] psud@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think their preference is to have US government under .gov.us

[-] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 months ago

.gov is allowed for use by any governments that invented the internet.

[-] chrishazfun@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I think once domains like @washington.usa.gov or @newyork.usa.gov get adopted for precenses on the network we'll be golden, the EU is already making huge steps for this (as always) so I honestly think it's only a matter of time, with custom software too I imagine.

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
1946 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

57226 readers
4652 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS