271

That mom-and-pop Seattle operation just can't catch a break.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 66 points 1 year ago

Amazon's argument seems to boil down to "we sell products, not ads, so the law shouldn't apply to us." The EC response seems to be "what you would like the law to say is not what it says."

Regardless, the fact that Amazon doesn't like the law means it was written to protect consumers from corporations. In the states, we've completely forgotten that government is supposed to do precisely that.

[-] madjo@geddit.social 27 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile, Amazon does sell ads. Sponsored products are advertisements.

[-] coldredlight@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

I don't remember the numbers but their ads division has been showing massive growth over the past several years, they make billions selling ads these days.

In the US, the Government does not represent the people, but those who buy elections. The people who buy elections have no incentive to change anything, and nothing will change in absence of a violent communist revoution

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
271 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37750 readers
413 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS